Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ish ishwar

edit summary issue
If this doesn't pass, it would be quite a shame. I see that at least 8 of the oppose votes are based on lack of edit summaries, an issue Ish ishwar has addressed already! I just don't see how you can oppose based on edit summaries at this point. Not only did he write a full paragraph about how he's going to use them in the future and knows they're important, he added a javascript thing to force edit summaries! What more can he do?--Alhutch 17:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Bureaucrats don't just count, they weigh 'votes'; so I would expect the closing 'crat to take into account the fact that Ish has adressed the issue promptly. Note that some editors don't check back after adding their vote, in which case they wouldn't have seen Ish's response; placing a note on their talk might help. &mdash; mark &#9998; 18:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * well, it's "no big deal" after all — as the page says. peace – ishwar  (speak)  22:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm optimistic about the outcome.--Alhutch 20:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)