Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/James Frankcom

Username: James Frankcom First edit: Sep 28, 2005 14:31:28 Unique articles edited: 830 Average edits per page: 4.45 Total edits (including deleted): 3,690 Deleted edits: 88 Live edits: 3,602 Namespace totals Article	3228	89.62% Talk	119	3.30% User	38	1.05% User talk	96	2.67% Wikipedia	17	0.47% Wikipedia talk	8	0.22% File	94	2.61% File talk	1	0.03% Template	1	0.03% Graph Month counts 2005/09	7	2005/10	25	2005/11	167	2005/12	81	2006/01	228	2006/02	50	2006/03	100	2006/04	270	2006/05	49	2006/06	11	2006/07	32	2006/08	18	2006/09	9	2006/10	0	2006/11	52	2006/12	0	2007/01	0	2007/02	7	2007/03	60	2007/04	17	2007/05	8	2007/06	39	2007/07	23	2007/08	5	2007/09	0	2007/10	53	2007/11	32	2007/12	95	2008/01	13	2008/02	29	2008/03	74	2008/04	256	2008/05	34	2008/06	109	2008/07	14	2008/08	24	2008/09	11	2008/10	73	2008/11	115	2008/12	39	2009/01	186	2009/02	20	2009/03	306	2009/04	180	2009/05	40	2009/06	107	2009/07	2	2009/08	11	2009/09	190	2009/10	16	2009/11	294	2009/12	21	Logs Files uploaded: 136 Top edited articles Article

* 189 - Kingdom_of_Gwynedd * 128 - Anwyl_of_Tywyn_Family * 75 - Surrey * 59 - Llywelyn_the_Last * 59 - Principality_of_Wales * 42 - Powys_Fadog * 41 - Brut_y_Brenhinedd * 41 - Crown_jewels * 40 - Kingdom_of_Powys * 36 - Wessex

Talk

* 18 - Brut_y_Brenhinedd * 15 - Ieuan_ab_Owain_Glyndŵr * 6 - Saddam_Hussein * 6 - Kingdom_of_Gwynedd * 6 - Kingdom_of_Powys * 4 - Large_Hadron_Collider * 3 - Abkhazia * 2 - Apu_Mallku * 2 - Anwyl_of_Tywyn_Family * 2 - Maelor

User

* 37 - James_Frankcom * 1 - Drachenfyre

User talk

* 65 - James_Frankcom * 4 - Enaidmawr * 3 - Phenylalanine * 3 - 81.111.119.98   * 3 - Geaugagrrl * 3 - Admrboltz/Archive_5 * 2 - Brianski * 2 - Fastily * 2 - OwenBlacker * 2 - Rhion

Wikipedia

* 3 - Requests_for_adminship/James_Frankcom * 2 - Third_opinion * 2 - Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2007_October_12 * 2 - WikiProject_King_Arthur * 2 - WikiProject_Wales * 1 - WikiProject_Heraldry_and_vexillology * 1 - WikiProject_Former_countries/Members * 1 - Welsh_Wikipedians'_notice_board * 1 - Articles_for_deletion/Rhirid_ab_Owain_Gwynedd * 1 - Articles_for_deletion/Cynllibiwg

Wikipedia talk

* 7 - WikiProject_Wales * 1 - Wikiproject_European_History/Sub-Roman_Britain_tas...

File

* 4 - Gwynedd_Cantrefi.jpg * 3 - Northwales.jpg * 2 - Gwynedd_1247_Map.jpg * 2 - Dinas_Emrys_Gorge.jpg * 2 - Llywelyn.jpg * 2 - Cherokee_original_claims.PNG * 1 - Zvonimir.jpg * 1 - Powys_new1.JPG * 1 - Table01.jpg * 1 - Powys3_1190.JPG

File talk

* 1 - Flag_of_Deheubarth.svg

Template

* 1 - Di-no_license/doc

Why is this RFA going ahead? RP459 (talk) 14:15, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is on hold awaiting the candidate to properly complete their nomination. Please see the candidate's talk page where the situation has been explained. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 14:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I now understand. RP459 (talk) 14:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Exchange between User:IP69.226.103.13 and TreasuryTag

 * (indented by TreasuryTag as this editor is clearly trying to make a completely unrelated point) ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  First Secretary of State  ─╢ 20:58, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It hardly matters, but I don't agree that TreasuryTag has the right to indent IP69's !vote, which comes out of a heated exchange above. Is this really and truly a WP:POINT violation? I think not. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * For the record, I think it's a textbook case of WP:POINT. IP69 commented "oppose" not because he opposed the candidacy, but to stick two fingers up (justifiably or otherwise) to those he was bickering with above. Classic example of making a point. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  co-prince  ─╢ 22:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Any Wikipedian with an account is welcome to comment in the Support, Oppose, and Neutral sections, but IPs are unable to place a numerical (#) "vote - per the instructions in the big blue box above. So TT was right to indent - not that it matters as 1) this RFA will fail anyway and 2) the closing crat will ignore this comment - well they should. We don't need to get all petty protocol and COI'y over this chaps. No, sorry - a registered account. Ignore me. Pedro : Chat  22:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, IP69 has decided that !votes clearly violating POINT are now permitted, so that's an encouraging new Wikipedia trend... ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  stannator  ─╢ 22:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's why we have bureaucrats TT - best dropped IMHO. Pedro : Chat  22:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Not as encouraging as your deciding consensus doesn't matter as the new wikipedia trend. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 22:25, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Talk page of the RFA ? Just a thought. Pedro : Chat  22:27, 29 December 2009 (UTC)