Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Keilana

Edit count for Keilana
User:Keilana

run at Sun Jan 6 03:45:37 2008 GMT

Category talk:        15 Category:             18 Image talk:           1 Image:                15 Mainspace             5783 MediaWiki talk:       2 Portal talk:          2 Portal:               92 Talk:                 511 Template talk:        2 Template:             106 User talk:            5039 User:                 394 Wikipedia talk:       106 Wikipedia:            1173 avg edits per page    1.39 earliest              17:09, 29 April 2007 number of unique pages 9540 total                 13259

2007/4  2 2007/5   658 2007/6   382 2007/7   2236 2007/8   2718 2007/9   1112 2007/10  1193 2007/11  2620 2007/12  1902 2008/1   436

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 101 Adam Clayton 89 List of U2 awards 70 Odyssey Number Five 60 U2 discography 51 Hurricane Charley 44 Where the Streets Have No Name 44 Assassination of Benazir Bhutto 27 Larry Mullen Jr. 23  U2 22  List of Red Hot Chili Peppers band members 20 Double Allergic 19 Le Havre 16 Carbon 12 Intabulation 11 Iquito

Talk: 24 Where the Streets Have No Name 12 White people 8 Adam Clayton 6 Larry Mullen Jr. 6  The Edge 4 Ground provisions 4 Mother Tucker 3 Defence Research Agency 3 U2 discography 3 Squamous cell papilloma 3 James Paul Lewis, Jr. 3  Lemass Era 3 The History Channel 3 SS France (1961) 3 Afrocentrism

Category: 2 Profanity

Image: 2 U2 barnstar.JPG

MediaWiki talk: 2 Common.css

Portal: 6 U2/Quotes 5 U2/Things you can do 5 NATO 5 U2/U2 news 5 U2 5 U2/Intro 4 U2/U2 topics 4 U2/Categories 3 NATO/NATO news 3 U2/AOTW/37, 2007 3 U2/WikiProjects 3 U2/Did you know 3 U2/Selected article 3 NATO/Selected picture 2 U2/Related portals

Portal talk: 2   U2

Template: 4 Announcements/Current collaborations 3 Portuguese ethnicity 3 U2 Barnstar 2 GA number 2 U2 Collaboration Barnstar 2 User label Nunavut 2 User label AL

User: 39 Triddle/stubsensor/20070716/1 38 Keilana/sandbox 27 Keilana/monobook.js 24 Triddle/stubsensor/20070716/2 22 Politics rule/new userpage 13 BOTijo/Images for biographies/1 12 Triddle/stubsensor/20070716/3 12 Triddle/stubsensor/20070206/8 12 Keilana/userboxen 11 Keilana/Recall 8 Triddle/stubsensor/20070206/17 8 Jonathan/Admin coaching 7 Keilana/userboxes 7 Keilana/monobook.css 6 Politics rule/userboxen

User talk: 101 ArielGold 85 Smithcool 63 Dihydrogen Monoxide 59 Ag�eyban� 43 Politics rule 40 Acalamari 21 Husond 18 JetLover 17 Phaedriel 17 Jmlk17 17 Angel David 17 Runewiki777 16 Anonymous Dissident 14 Keilana 14 Alagaesia dragon

Wikipedia: 99 Administrator intervention against vandalism 57 Help desk 37 WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Drive/12 35 WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Drive 31 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 27 Requests for page protection 25 WikiProject Keep It Simple 22 Requests for checkuser 17 Usernames for administrator attention 15 Administrators' noticeboard/3RR 15 Requests for adminship/Neranei 2 15 Featured list candidates/List of U2 awards 15 Featured article candidates/Odyssey Number Five 14 WikiProject U2/layout/news 13 Village pump (policy)

Wikipedia talk: 19 Requests for adminship 11 WikiProject U2 8 Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-08-19 White people 7 AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage 7 School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/LovelyGirls 6 Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-07-28 The History Channel 6 Wikipedia Signpost/2007-09-03/WikiScanner 5 WikiProject U2/collaborationofthefortnightdepartment 4 School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/ZYANYA06 4 WikiProject Accessibility 4 School and university projects/ITESM Campus Toluca/Copitas 3 Articles for deletion/James Barker (athlete) 2 WikiProject U2/collaborationofthefortnightdepartment/timetable 2 Requests for adminship/Footballfan190 2 Requests for checkuser

If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot . Based directly on these URLs: [1], [2], [3]


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 03:45, 6 January 2008 (UTC).

Speedy Close

 * 1) I support this user but ask for this to be speedy closed, just like any other unnecessary reconfirmation RFAs.  Hús  ö  nd  01:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Deskana said that no 'crat would close it early. Also, if I withdraw, I lose the tools. Just to clarify. Keilana talk(recall) 01:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Why would you lose the tools if you withdrew? Sorry Keilana, you are one of my favorite users but these reconfirmation RFAs are becoming a much unneeded trend. You are open to recall and only a recall RFA should be in order. This is not the case. Hús  ö  nd  01:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Errm, it actually is a recall RFA - A l is o n  ❤ 01:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a reconfirmation RfA. Same diff. The result of RRfAs (as they are called) is that "failed/no consensus --> tools removed". &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide 02:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed, thanks for clarifying, Alison and DHMO. This is a recall request, technically, and I would lose the tools if I withdrew because it would be closed as a failure/no consensus for me to have the tools, and I would have to ask for desysopping on Meta. Again, not a "I think I'll go through RfA to get a bunch of nice compliments" request, more of a "someone asked me to stand again" thing. Regards, Keilana talk(recall) 02:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This is not a recall. The word "recall" isn't mentioned in the nomination, and this RFA doesn't even comply to User:Keilana/Recall. How can this be a recall? Hús  ö  nd  02:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Because of comments I made on WT:RFA saying that I would accept recall/reconfirmation if anyone wanted it because of the recent issues; it was a temporary suspension of my recall procedures. It really should've said recall. Regards, Keilana talk(recall) 02:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keilana, users participating in this RFA won't be able to guess that this is a recall. And in fact, it is not, as it does not follow your own criteria/procedure for a recall. I strongly recommend that you fix this by providing a detailed explanation on whether this is a reconfirmation or a recall RFA. If it can be fixed at all, that is. Hús  ö  nd  02:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Where should I go about this? I don't want to mess with Dihydrogen's nom. Keilana talk(recall) 02:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Can't get any messier. ;-) Hús  ö  nd  02:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * True. I'll clarify what I can. Keilana talk(recall) 03:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * We have consistency in our set period of days RFA. Sometimes however, it does not take that long to get a consensus on something.  Consensus seems clear in this case, and I don't think this RFA has a snowballs chance in heck of failing.  I ask, no, I call for the logical conclusion.  Thank you, M- ercury at 03:04, January 7, 2008
 * So I stand corrected, given wmarsh's evidence. M- ercury at 04:24, January 7, 2008

I am damn confused as to what led to this request for reconfirmation. The users edit history is intact and available, and no accusations of abuse of position has been declared. It seems to me that this reconfirmation was requested just because the ability to do so existed.

Advice to admins out there, if you are going to be open to recall make criteria, like "You must have some sort of a reason". Better advice, don't be open to recall, let the existing procedures handle it, the new ones don't work. Otherwise you get this sort of nonsense where instead of asking "Should this person be desysoped" we are asking "Should we let this admin be an admin" for no reason other than the fact that somebody could do it so they did. 1 != 2 18:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I thought one of the conditions with recall was that there had to be a legitimate reason for a recall. I didn't think one could be initiated "out of the blue" in case certain people had a grudge against a particular admin. Acalamari 18:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The person who initiated has also voiced "support", I believe. I find this rather ironic as somebody who voiced some minor objections about the current renaming process but advised against an RFA. --kingboyk (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)