Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Kzrulzuall

Kzrulzuall's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 01:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC):

User:Kzrulzuall run at Fri Apr 13 01:04:09 2007 GMT

Category talk: 1 Category: 15 Image talk: 3 Image: 32 Mainspace 2187 Portal talk: 1 Portal: 11 Talk: 364 Template talk: 2 Template: 47 User talk: 1870 User: 526 Wikipedia talk: 56 Wikipedia: 779 avg edits per page 1.72 earliest 06:51, 26 October 2006 number of unique pages 3436 total 5894

2006/10 45   2006/11  89   2006/12  124   2007/1  345   2007/2  1703   2007/3  2341   2007/4  1247

Mainspace 162	Master of the Game 17	The Sky is Falling (novel) 17	Andy Roddick 15	Brian Caswell 14	John Grisham 13	Tennis 13	Sidney Sheldon 12	John Marsden (writer) 12	Homer Simpson 9	Master of the Game(mini-series) 9	So Much To Tell You 8	Roger Federer 7	Only the Heart 7	Burke and Wills expedition 7	Nothing Lasts Forever (1994 novel) Talk: 10	Tennis 9	Manchester United F.C. 8	MapleStory 8	Homer Simpson 7	Kipper 5	Andy Roddick 4	3D computer graphics 3	Roger Federer 3	The Sky is Falling (novel) 2	Only the Heart 2	Sophie Masson 2	Edmund Barton 2	Capella University 2	Stefanie Sun 2	Valiathan Category: 3	Start-Class tennis articles 3	Tennis articles with comments 2	Politicians of the Republic of China 2	Unassessed tennis articles Image: 4	Nothing Lasts Forever (novel).jpg 3	Morning, Noon And Night.jpg Portal: 2	Geography 2	Tennis/box-header Template: 14	Importance Scheme 12	WP-Tennis 7	TENCOL 3	User WikiProject Tennis 3	Tennis topic 2	WPTennis Navbar 2	COTWs User: 88	Kzrulzuall/UserPage 51	Kzrulzuall/monobook.js 40	Kzrulzuall 26	Kzrulzuall/VandalismLog 25	Kzrulzuall/Opening 23	Kzrulzuall/End 22	Kzrulzuall/VandalismStats 21	Kzrulzuall/sandbox 16	Kzrulzuall/Main Page 13	Kzrulzuall/Middle 10	Kzrulzuall/Talk November 2006 10	Kzrulzuall/Talk Header 6	Kzrulzuall/Awards 6	Kzrulzuall/Insults 6	Kzrulzuall/Templates/Navigation Bar User talk: 149	Kzrulzuall 117	Sp3000 21	Jimbo Wales 19	Kuru 11	Essjay 10	Redux 9	Rajkumar Kanagasingam 8	HideandLeek 8	John Reaves 8	Trampton 7	DavidYork71 6	65.255.130.104 4	24.168.4.15 4	Arjun01 4	24.69.167.145 Wikipedia: 172	Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 121	Administrator intervention against vandalism 33	Article Creation and Improvement Drive 28	Help desk 26	WikiProject Tennis 24	Requests for page protection 17	Reference desk/Computing 15	Editor review/Kzrulzuall 13	Articles for deletion/Lunchtime soccer 12	Sandbox 12	Reference desk/Entertainment 11	WikiProject Tennis/Assessment 10	Sandbox/Storytelling 10	Suspected sock puppets/Kzrulzuall36 (2nd) 9	WikiProject Tennis/Welcome Wikipedia talk: 22	Attack sites 16	WikiProject Tennis 8	WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Twinkle 4	Sandbox/Storytelling 3	Version 1.0 Editorial Team

Neutral
I would oppose, but I'd rather leave this evidence here for other editors to look over, and judge for themselves. All of these excerpts were taken from his Talk Page or related, and are genuine, but do not provide the diffs. I can look through the archives again to find them if you want solid proof. '''I strongly suggest each editor review the following before voting. Note date and circumstances of each conversation.'''


 * His signature is modified in some places so as not to break template code. Statements that I think are pivotal are bolded. ALTON  .ıl  20:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'll try and reply to all of these, if possible.

1.The first one was an obvious mistake by me, which I apologized for. Despite living there for several years, I was unaware that China was called the People's Republic of China, as opposed to the Republic of China.

2. Until the middle of February, I was mainly concerned about edit count and didn't know a whole deal about Wiki-Process. I considered Wikipedia a bit of a game back then, but after a while, started regarding it as a serious project.

3. I was clearly angry, and said some very strong words that time. After Sp3000 reminded me to keep cool, I basically thought about what I did. As I said before, I wasn't very experienced at that time, but it is no excuse for my behavior.

4. It definitely looked like a advertisement for an company... He said this. 

5. From that point forward, I reminded myself to read the instructions first...

6. Actually I think I found the same article on a mirror of Wikipedia, which shows it was an exact replica of the article. That was before I knew it was an mirror, obviously...

7. Oh that incident was very weird... Somehow, since Lupin's tool gives you the change + one line of text, I saw The Lion King straight after that... It was obviously two vandalism edits, but I wasn't sure if it was vandalism... I've heard there are adult remakes of those cartoon movies...

8. I basically clicked the edit button, accidentally put keep in the edit summary, went back and changed it, then clicked edit again. It accidentally wiped out an edit in the process though... -- KZ Talk • Contribs 22:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd like to also point out the RFCU case - I stated that Kz has a competitive nature and especially against me. That was the reason why he started Wikipedia. However, I think he started to learn over time that editing Wikipedia might be a good thing after all. --The preceding comment was signed by Us  e  r:Sp3000  (talk•contribs) 22:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair enough.  ALTON   .ıl  22:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

==Moved from nomination page= ''Moved from my vote on the nomination page. KazakhPol 22:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)''
 * Me and other editors have given you suitable warnings on not making those remarks on the talk page. Since you intended to pursue this issue, I gave you a warning based on your disruptive and hurtful comments in that article talk. As for the other matters, I've apologized for the comments, so you can hardly judge me for an apologetic remark. -- KZ  Talk • Contribs 07:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You mean "other editors and I" and apologizing for being disruptive hardly rectifies your actions. KazakhPol 07:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I never said that it rectifies my actions, but just want to point out that my apology shouldn't be used as evidence of my "disruptive" behavior. -- KZ Talk • Contribs 07:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * KazahkPol, your pedantry is a sure sign that you've realized you have no valid points and your argument holds no merit. John Reaves (talk) 07:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The diffs speak for themselves. I suggest he retracts his nomination. KazakhPol 07:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This oppose borders on WP:POINT. KazahkPol, your warnings were completely valid. If you're going to oppose, oppose for a real reason, not because you are upset you were caught violating policy. &rArr;    SWAT Jester    On Belay!  00:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Swatjester, you were not involved in the dispute and are hardly in a position to be declaring votes "WP:POINT" given the uncivility of your support vote. KazakhPol 22:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)