Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Malcolmxl5

Edit count for Malcolmxl5
User:Malcolmxl5

run at Sat Aug 23 14:36:49 2008 GMT

Category:             8 Image talk:           2 Image:                5 Mainspace             10961 Portal:               3 Talk:                 2452 Template:             18 User talk:            437 User:                 620 Wikipedia talk:       224 Wikipedia:            1449 avg edits per page    2.28 earliest              23:18, 9 April 2007 number of unique pages 7087 total                 16179

2007/4 77   2007/5  206   2007/6  611   2007/7  867   2007/8  807   2007/9  1127   2007/10 1068   2007/11 1101   2007/12 2751   2008/1  1180   2008/2  534   2008/3  1184   2008/4  737   2008/5  1272   2008/6  776   2008/7  1225   2008/8  656

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red  denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 147 [2]Lomana LuaLua 92 [3]Nigel Reo-Coker 84 [4]Celtic F.C. season 2000-01 82 [5]Freddy Eastwood 79 [6]Scott Carson 76 [7]Carlton Cole 76 [8]Teddy Sheringham 74 [9]Jermain Defoe 70 [10]Billy Bonds 63 [11]Stephen Bywater 60 [12]First Civil Service Commissioner 55 [13]Hayden Mullins 54 [14]Office for National Statistics 54 [15]Bobby Zamora 51 [16]Marlon Harewood

Talk: 23 [17]Freddy Eastwood 17 [18]Carlos T�vez 11 [19]Yossi Benayoun 8 [20]William Lawrence Balls 8 [21]Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 7 [22]Scott Parker (footballer) 7 [23]Arthur James Turner 6 [24]Julian Waterfall Pollack 6 [25]Trenton, Ontario 5 [26]Rayavaram (Krishna district) 5 [27]Billy Bonds 5 [28]Edward Vick 5 [29]Tilbury 4 [30]George Kay 4 [31]Alan Curbishley

Image: 4 [32]Keynsham Town.JPG

Portal: 2 [33]Wales/New article announcements

Template: 3 [34]Mansfield Town F.C. squad 2 [35]Wrexham F.C. squad

User: 248 [36]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox 174 [37]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult 70 [38]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox2 61 [39]Malcolmxl5 12 [40]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive5 11 [41]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive4 9  [42]Woody/Sandbox 4  [43]AlexNewArtBot/COISearchResult/archive2 4  [44]Fabrictramp 3  [45]Gogo Dodo 2  [46]Justmeherenow/Obama family of Kenya/Sandbox 2  [47]West Ham Fan 2  [48]MediaStudies110

User talk: 53 [49]Malcolmxl5 10 [50]Gogo Dodo 8 [51]Muffin Man 23 7 [52]69.157.65.118   6  [53]Poeloq 6 [54]Malcolmxl5/Archive 1 6 [55]Blotto adrift 5 [56]Joseffudge 5 [57]Redrocket 5 [58]Mr Hall of England 4 [59]Malcolmxl5/Sandbox 4 [60]Kurt Shaped Box 4 [61]Meco 4 [62]207.188.72.46   4  [63]86.160.240.191

Wikipedia: 150 [64]WikiProject Football 30 [65]WikiProject Football/New articles 14 [66]WikiProject Football/Booklist 12 [67]Articles for deletion/Frankie Loscavio 11 [68]Articles for deletion/Lewis Stanson 9  [69]WikiProject Football/Links 9  [70]Articles for deletion/Tymm Hoffman 9  [71]Articles for deletion/Nicolai Lomov 9  [72]Pages needing translation into English 8  [73]Administrator intervention against vandalism 7  [74]Articles for deletion/GlavUpDK 7  [75]Articles for deletion/Systemshock 7  [76]Articles for deletion/Celtic F.C. season 2000-01 6  [77]Articles for deletion/Log/2007 November 15 6  [78]Articles for deletion/John FitzGerald

Wikipedia talk: 165 [79]WikiProject Football 6  [80]New pages patrol/patrolled pages 5  [81]WikiProject Non-league football 3  [82]WikiProject Automobiles/Archive 10 3  [83]WikiProject Astronomy 3  [84]Manual of Style (flags) 2  [85]WikiProject Mathematics 2  [86]Noticeboard for India-related topics 2  [87]WikiProject Australia 2  [88]WikiProject Topical outlines 2  [89]Archived delete discussions

If there were any problems, please [90]email Interiot or post at  [91]User talk:Interiot.


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 14:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC).


 * Surely an admin candidate who !votes Delete in AfDs for obviously non-encyclopedic articles should be a reason to support, not oppose? Or am I missing something?  All those articles were obvious deletes apart from the two that ended up merge/no consensus.  If we opposed everyone who !voted Delete on an AfD that was eventually kept, we'd have no admins at all.  Also, some of those AfDs are over a year old.... bizarre. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 19:06, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Oppose vote by La Grande Roi

 * From what I know, Le Grand Roi opposes the candidate if they have opposing viewpoints on any RfAs - CL — 19:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This is one of the the most idiotic and personal opposes I've seen. Yanksox (talk) 20:31, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Immature responses are not how to convince people to support. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 20:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I am opposing because those were encyclopedic articles that were unjustifiably deleted. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 20:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a personal vendetta against the deleting admin, not the candidate at large. Furthermore, I'm sick of people that act almost like mere pond scum and just pounce on this like a soapbox. I remember one character in particular that did it to my RfA and others and was blocked sometime after for being a sockmaster. I'm not saying anything in particular, but just putting it out there. Yanksox (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What?! I am opposing because I disagree with the candidate's interpretation of inclusion criteria and how they would likely close AfDs.  Those discussions I cite above were closed by several different admins.  Which one do I allegedly have a vendetta against?  -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 20:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This is not a vendetta against the deleting admin, but against all admins who have ever deleted anything. --T-rex 21:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If that were so, then I would not have would have to oppose those who closed Articles for deletion/Adams equation, Articles for deletion/Adult-child sex (2nd nomination), Articles for deletion/Alhaji sani labaran, Articles for deletion/Bagot Beast, Articles for deletion/Butt harp, Articles for deletion/Canyon of the Vaginas, Articles for deletion/Delboo, Articles for deletion/Dorian's identity, Articles for deletion/Easy-cook rice (joke), etc. I don't oppose people because they argue to delete as I myself have argued and nominated to delete more articles than I good number of editors I have seen have argued to keep.  I oppose based on what and why editors argued to delete.  Someone can actually be a deletionist of sorts and every thing they argued to delete I might not disagree with.  Look through those whom I have supported and I am sure they have argued to delete here and there.  It has nothing to do with simply arguing to delete, again, it is what I believe to be misinterpretations of inclusion criteria or incorrect arguments.  -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 21:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Le Grand Roi, I understand your opinion, but can you at least provide diffs from, well, 2008 next time? Wizardman  21:24, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I shall keep that in mind. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 21:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles has a right to oppose. He opposed my RFA, but I learned a lot because of his oppose !vote. It is important for editors to understand that deleting some articles can undo years of work of other editors. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 10:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)