Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Morhange

Edit count for Morhange
Edit stats and most edited pages  User:Morhange

run at Fri Jul 11 18:50:38 2008 GMT

Category talk:        5 Category:             17 Image talk:           3 Image:                32 Mainspace             7144 Portal talk:          1 Portal:               3 Talk:                 559 Template talk:        18 Template:             314 User talk:            123 User:                 354 Wikipedia talk:       9 Wikipedia:            140 avg edits per page    3.57 earliest              18:04, 1 July 2005 number of unique pages 2446 total                 8722

2005/7 55   2005/8  210   2005/9  193   2005/10 121   2005/11 4   2005/12 83   2006/1  106   2006/2  118   2006/3  108   2006/4  96   2006/5  132   2006/6  116   2006/7  56   2006/8  242   2006/9  331   2006/10 402   2006/11 341   2006/12 154   2007/1  205   2007/2  188   2007/3  162   2007/4  214   2007/5  90   2007/6  233   2007/7  418   2007/8  339   2007/9  330   2007/10 239   2007/11 230   2007/12 536   2008/1  226   2008/2  606   2008/3  578   2008/4  378   2008/5  388   2008/6  333   2008/7  161

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red  denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 277 [2]List of passengers on board RMS Titanic 261 [3]Line of succession to the British throne 108 [4]List of crew members on board RMS Titanic 69 [5]Prince Christian of Denmark 59 [6]Grandchildren of Victoria and Albert 54 [7]RMS Titanic 53 [8]Wittenberg University 52 [9]Prince Louis of Luxembourg 49 [10]Princess Isabella of Denmark 43 [11]Prince Nikolai of Denmark 42 [12]Princess Ariane of the Netherlands 41 [13]Millvina Dean 40 [14]Robert C. Henry 40 [15]Sidney Leslie Goodwin 38 [16]Prince Leopold, Duke of Brabant

Talk: 64 [17]Line of succession to the British throne 10 [18]Prince John Constantinovich of Russia 10 [19]List of passengers on board RMS Titanic 10 [20]Prince Philippe, Duke of Brabant 9 [21]Grand Duke George Mikhailovich of Russia 8 [22]Princess Ariane of the Netherlands 8 [23]Line of succession to the Bruneian throne 7 [24]Marie of Edinburgh 7 [25]Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia 6 [26]Princess Margaret of Connaught 6 [27]Snakes on a Plane 6 [28]Grand Duke Constantine Constantinovich of Russia 6 [29]Living Titanic survivors 6 [30]RMS Titanic 6 [31]Millvina Dean

Category talk: 2 [32]People from Springfield, Ohio 2 [33]Danish princes

Category: 5 [34]Royal children 4 [35]Grandchildren of Victoria and Albert 2 [36]Knights of the Order of the Norwegian Lion

Image: 4 [37]Greatdayinharlem.jpg 3 [38]Alicetrevor.jpg 3 [39]Sigismund.jpg 3 [40]Eugeneroe.jpg 3 [41]Rchenry.jpg 2 [42]Wilhelm-louis.jpg 2 [43]Rch fh photo.jpg 2 [44]GeorgeVmetro.jpg

Image talk: 3 [45]CorleoneFamilyTree.png

Template: 16 [46]Russian tsareviches 14 [47]House of Gl�cksburg (Greece) 13 [48]Royal House of Romania 13 [49]Russian grand duchesses 13 [50]Dutch Royal Family 11 [51]Jordanian Royal Family 11 [52]Titanic on film and TV  11 [53]Titanic last survivors 10 [54]Austrian Imperial Family 9 [55]House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (Belgium) 9 [56]Spanish Royal Family 9 [57]Greek Royal Family 9 [58]Belgian Royal Family 8 [59]Titanic crew 8 [60]British princesses

Template talk: 7 [61]Did you know 2 [62]House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (UK) 2 [63]British princesses by marriage

User: 141 [64]Morhange 124 [65]Morhange/List of Passengers on the RMS Titanic 29 [66]Morhange/List of decendants of Queen Victoria 15 [67]Morhange/Template:Hesse 7  [68]Morhange/Template:Russian princes 6  [69]Morhange/HRH of the Netherlands 6  [70]UBX/Tolkienism 6  [71]Morhange/jate 5  [72]Morhange/Template:Russian princesses 3  [73]SuggestBot/Requests 2  [74]Morhange/George, Count Brasov 2  [75]Morhange/Template:House of Hohenzollern 2  [76]Morhange/Michel Navratil

User talk: 38 [77]Morhange 5 [78]136.227.2.68   5  [79]Charles 5 [80]Pandas2000x 4 [81]Morhange/Archive 2 3 [82]Happy138 3 [83]71.17.88.49   3  [84]Holtville 3 [85]DWC LR   3  [86]Davidwr 3 [87]Mholland 3 [88]Magioladitis 2 [89]74.14.16.202   2  [90]Tad102 2 [91]Colin

Wikipedia: 32 [92]Requested moves 11 [93]Articles for deletion/Popomundo (second nomination) 7     [94]Articles for deletion/List of passengers and crew onboard RMS Titan ic  6  [95]Categories for discussion/Log/2008 April 16 6 [96]Articles for deletion/Eloise Taylor (2nd nomination) 4 [97]Articles for deletion/Amelia Morales y de Grecia 4 [98]Articles for deletion/�rika Ortiz Rocasolano 3     [99]Featured list candidates/List of passengers onboard RMS Titanic/arc hive1 3 [100]Requests for page protection 3 [101]Administrator intervention against vandalism 3 [102]Articles for deletion/Dylan and Hayden Whitbread 3 [103]Articles for deletion/Carlos Morales y de Grecia 2 [104]Articles for deletion/Prince Nikolai of Denmark 2     [105]Featured list candidates/Line of succession to the British Throne/ archive2 2 [106]Articles for deletion/Prince Pierre of Orl�ans

Wikipedia talk: 6 [107]WikiProject Royalty

If there were any problems, please [108]email Interiot or post at  [109]User talk:Interiot.


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 18:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC).

Early transclusion

 * Moved from main RfA page


 * Was this transcluded early? Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 18:44, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like it actually - Questions haven't been answered. Not necessarily malformed. I suggest that users refrain from casting their vote until after the candidate answers the main questions. Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 18:51, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You can't support until you see what the candiate will do as an admin.America69 18:53, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This should probably be pulled from RFA until questions are answered? Gary King ( talk ) 19:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No reason to pull it, I'm hoping editors judge nominations by much more than just answers to these questions. You should be able to support or oppose a candidate without any questions at all. Give the nominee some time! RxS (talk) 19:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I realized that I had transcluded before I'd answered the questions--I was checking the guide and I mixed up the steps, which was my mistake. I went to fix the problem, but someone had already reverted :) I'm working on the questions, but I have to head off to work until later tonight, but I hope to have those finished by tonight. I don't have to leave for about ten minutes or so, so I'll answer as best I can so people can vote if they'd like :) Morhange (talk) 19:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Kurt's support

 * 1) Support &mdash; Office fan...can't ask for much more.  Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 21:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Kurt actually supports a RfA! (Note to self: become an Office fan before running for adminship)  - Diligent  Terrier  (and friends) 21:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Always great to see a Kurt support. :)  Lra drama 21:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't believe Kurt is actually getting "harassed" for this. Do others not realize that it is us, as a community, that are creating the storm in the teacup, not Kurt?  Keeper  | 76  |  what's in a name?  21:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * What harrasment? Becoming astonished when he supports is harrasment in itself, you should just accept it, making it a big deal can be upsetting.--Serviam (talk)  13:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, shame on the both of you. (Agree with Keeper, in other words.) —Giggy 08:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Comment: Wow, support from Kurt! That's rare enough that we might need to make a "WP:SFK" policy to state that such a vote overrules all opposition. :-P Cosmic Latte (talk) 10:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know, I think that Kurt actually supporting an RFA is a rare and interesting enough event that it deserves to be noted. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC).
 * I see nothing in the above comments that leads me to believe that this qualifies as harassment. That's some strong language. I think I get what Keeper is saying, but really, it was just being noted. I, myself, was a little surprised to see Kurt supporting. Refreshing actually. Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 13:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything particularly surprising about this. Once again, kurt is voting based on something that has nothing at all to do with whether the candidate at hand would be a good admin. I guess we can be glad he's finally spicing things up. –<font face="Verdana"> xeno <font color="#DCDCDC">cidic ( talk ) 14:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * What makes you say that? Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 15:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Just the fact that liking "The Office" has about as much to do with the candidates suitability for adminship as self-nomming and receiving guidance from an admin coach. –<font face="Verdana"> xeno <font color="#DCDCDC">cidic ( talk ) 15:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * ...you thought I was actually serious about that being the reason for my support? Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 15:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * /shrug. I only go one the information I have, and you haven't responded to the inquiry on your user talk page about what makes you think this person is a good candidate. nevertheless, struck my comments. –<font face="Verdana"> xeno <font color="#DCDCDC">cidic ( talk ) 16:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Why must so many things on Wikipedia be contradicted to the extent they have to result in unecessary discussions like this? People who made comment made a lighthearted, good intentioned comment, noting something that is good to see on RfA. It was not harassment. It was not meant to cause an uproar. This has been taken way out of context, which is not only saddening, but typical of what occurs on Wikipedia nowadays. :'-( <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans-serif"> Lra drama 14:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Why all the fuss? There has never been discussion that supporting based on being a fan of the office is beyond the pale. ;-) Hiberniantears (talk) 17:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)