Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Newyorkbrad

Breakdown of edits using Ais523's edit counter. James086 Talk 05:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Article namespace : 1367
 * Manual vandalism reverts: 199
 * Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 1
 * Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 30
 * Removals: 8
 * Redirects: 17
 * Deletion-related edit summaries: 35
 * Addition-related edit summaries: 199
 * Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 36
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 839
 * No edit summary: 3


 * Talk namespace : 202
 * Manual vandalism reverts: 14
 * Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 1
 * Removals: 1
 * Proposed deletion-related tagging: 1
 * Deletion-related edit summaries: 3
 * Addition-related edit summaries: 5
 * Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 3
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 167
 * Edits to sections, with no further summary: 5


 * User namespace : 57
 * Manual vandalism reverts: 18
 * Deletion-related edit summaries: 2
 * Addition-related edit summaries: 1
 * Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 6
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 30


 * User talk namespace : 1461
 * Manual vandalism reverts: 8
 * Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 7
 * Redirects: 1
 * Welcomes: 40
 * XfD deletion-related tagging: 2
 * Speedy deletion-related tagging: 1
 * Deletion-related edit summaries: 10
 * Addition-related edit summaries: 15
 * Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 40
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 1282


 * Wikipedia namespace : 1721
 * Manual vandalism reverts: 6
 * Automatic (rollback/script/tool) reverts: 1
 * Manual reverts not marked as vandalism reverts: 18
 * Removals: 7
 * Redirects: 5
 * Welcomes: 1
 * XfD deletion-related tagging: 1
 * Speedy deletion-related tagging: 26
 * Deletion-related edit summaries: 76
 * Addition-related edit summaries: 61
 * Non-deletion voting-related edit summaries: keep: 40, oppose: 5, support: 122
 * Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 63
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 1284
 * Edits to sections, with no further summary: 3
 * No edit summary: 1


 * Wikipedia talk namespace : 359
 * Manual vandalism reverts: 1
 * Deletion-related edit summaries: 4
 * Addition-related edit summaries: 8
 * Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 15
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 329


 * Template namespace : 6
 * Addition-related edit summaries: 1
 * Unknown abbreviation (≤4 characters): 1
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 4


 * Template talk namespace : 1
 * Unrecognised edit summary: 1


 * Total : 5174

Wow. 63 supports in 10 hours.
That's the fastest I've ever seen votes come in, much less having all of them be supports...
 * Phaedriel was at 94/0/1 ten hours after acceptance. - crz crztalk 15:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow. -Amarkov blahedits 16:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

You have so much support, Tangobot doesn't know what do with itself and can't transmit your standings. You actually blew up a bot. Score! Kafziel Talk 18:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The real question is whether Brad will crack WP:300, and, if so, whether we will have to create Times that 300 Wikipedians voted support for something. TheronJ 19:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That depends if the bureaucrat is willing to extend the time limit for additional sockpuppet creation gathering of support. --tjstrf talk 19:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * WP:300 has already been achieved. Look at WP:200, and you will see that the Main Page redesign vote attracted nearly 700 votes in support, while CSCWEM got just over 300 votes in his ArbCom election candidacy. Carcharoth 23:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)