Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nrwairport

Oppose, this editor should at least be mentored by a veteran editor before being considered as an admin.(Regushee (talk) 22:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC))

Oppose
I'm adding  my  vote here because the RfA  was closed while I  was typing  it:


 * 1) Oppose. This user's patrolling is disasterous -  little more than arbitrary  clicking  on  the various opttions/criteria on  the Curation  Tool, not  to  mention all  the other issues  including  masquerading  as an admin  and claiming  to  have 500,000 edits under an admitted  previous account they  refuse to publish. Please see the many  messages on  their talk page and the mess:age my  talk page. The user is also  under investigation  at  SPI. I  venture to  suggest  that  this is either a compromised account  or plain, simple trolling. See user:Kudpung, and User talk:GB fan, and Sockpuppet investigations/Cyntiamaspian, and the previously  deleted RfA attempt.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)