Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/PaxEquilibrium

PaxEquilibrium's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 00:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC):

Category:	9 Image talk:	12 Image:	39 Mainspace	5046 Portal talk:	10 Portal:	42 Talk:	2318 Template talk:	49 Template:	202 User talk:	5236 User:	302 Wikipedia talk:	108 Wikipedia:	649 avg edits per page	5.22 earliest	16:49, 24 August 2005 number of unique pages	2686 total	14022 2005/8 	66 	2005/9 	245 	2005/10 	320 	2005/11 	725 	2005/12 	891 	2006/1 	801 	2006/2 	455 	2006/3 	699 	2006/4 	1055 	2006/5 	651 	2006/6 	853 	2006/7 	119 	2006/8 	75 	2006/9 	802 	2006/10 	908 	2006/11 	998 	2006/12 	844 	2007/1 	645 	2007/2 	527 	2007/3 	808 	2007/4 	1148 	2007/5 	387 	(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 252	History of the demographics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 167	Duklja 97	National Assembly of Serbia 91	Stephen II of Bosnia 84	Kosovo 82	Lika 82	Ljudevit Posavski 79	Matej Ninoslav 71	Pagania 68	Serbian parliamentary election, 2007 66	Serbs of Croatia 61	Demographic history of Kosovo 58	Roger Joseph Boscovich 54	Petar II Petrović-Njegoš 53	Montenegrins Talk: 113	Pagania 88	Sokollu Mehmet Paşa 82	Kosovo 75	Roger Joseph Boscovich 69	Kosovo/Archive 8 59	Kosovo/Archive 12 58	Serbs 57	Stephen II of Bosnia 52	Duklja 52	Kosovo/Archive 11 48	House of Petrović-Njegoš 41	History of the demographics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 40	History of Bosnia and Herzegovina 32	Ivo Andrić 32	Montenegrins Category: 2	Kosovo Image: 3	SrbiBalkan.gif 2	Srbi u Jugoslaviji.jpg 2	Arhpetar.jpg 2	Stefan Nemanja.jpg 2	Ston.jpg 2	Mihailo.jpg Image talk: 2	000 Montenegrins.JPG Portal: 14	Montenegro/Did you know 7	Montenegro/Intro 4	Bosnia and Herzegovina/Intro 3	Montenegro/Web resources 2	Montenegro/Featured article 2	Montenegro/Featured person Portal talk: 3	Montenegro 2	Politics 2	Current events Template: 40	Serbian parliamentary election, 2003 15	Serbian elections 13	Montenegrin parliamentary election, 2006 11	Serbian parliamentary election, 2007 11	User cg 8	Serbian political parties 7	Montenegrin elections 6	Assembly of Serbia and Montenegro 5	User cg-4 5	Infobox Kosovo 5	User cg-2 4	User cg-3 4	User bs 4	MontePres 4	User cg-1 Template talk: 14	Serbs 6	User cg-4 4	User cg 4	Serbian elections 3	Assembly of Serbia and Montenegro 3	Serbian parliamentary election, 2003 3	Infobox Kosovo 2	Montenegrins 2	User bs 2	In the news User: 93	PaxEquilibrium 16	PaxEquilibrium/Poll 14	Luka Jačov 10	Nightstallion/notes 9	Chris 73/Archive 008 7	Getoar 6	194.152.217.129 5	PaxEquilibrium/Petition 5	Tar-Elenion 4	Praskaton 4	Linuxbeak/Wikimania 2006/Wikipedian Survey 4	Kubura 3	Ilir pz 3	Elephantus 3	Bormalagurski User talk: 255	Nightstallion 176	PANONIAN 171	Joy 170	Ilir pz 129	Kubura 114	Emir Arven 108	CrnaGora 107	Afrika paprika 107	Jagoda 1 106	Dijxtra 102	Sideshow Bob 94	Dado 89	Kseferovic 89	Mir Harven 85	Marinko Wikipedia: 45	Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 41	Requests for page protection 29	Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika 27	Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Workshop 23	Administrators' noticeboard/3RR 21	In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates 20	Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor 4 17	Requests for comment/Emir Arven 17	Personal attack intervention noticeboard 13	Article Creation and Improvement Drive 13	WikiProject Unrecognized countries 11	Requests for checkuser/Case/Kubura 11	Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor3 10	Administrator intervention against vandalism 9	Changing username Wikipedia talk: 11	WikiProject Belgrade 9	WikiProject Former Yugoslavia 9	List of Wikipedians by number of edits 5	WikiProject Serbia 5	Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika 5	WikiProject Military history/Balkan military history task force 5	Requests for arbitration/Kosovo 4	WikiProject Montenegro 4	WikiProject Kosovo 3	Administrator intervention against vandalism 3	WikiProject Fascism 3	WikiProject Croatia 3	WikiProject History 3	Notability 3	WikiProject Awards

Problem
Like I said in the comments already. If someone mentions me a single good reason why I should not be an administrator - he/she should do notify me in person of that and I will withdraw the request.

So far I've seen (aside from votestalking and allegations of my *insanity*) the only argument presented (although User:Alabamaboy has noted the edit summaries, however I do not see this enough as explained at his talk page) is the huge incident that happened over my death hoax around a year ago. I need only one b'crat to come to me and notify me that this is why I simply cannot be trusted admin tools (regardless of whether I'm just a victim or the culprit; I'll understand sensible arguments) - and I will pull this nomination. --PaxEquilibrium 07:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Bureaucrats judge consensus. There was clearly no consensus - and therefore we cannot promote. Secretlondon 20:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Votes
OK, so let's see:
 * User:Zmaj, User:Ceha and possibly (although not surely) User:Ante Perkovic's votes seem to be invited (the first one for sure, probably the second too), while they (the first and the last) call upon my insanity in their (opposing) votes.
 * User:Hipocrite has said that he will (or a bureaucrat, if he doesn't) move his vote to neutral after I assured him that I posses a strong password.
 * 3 Neutral votes have decided to sit and wait before they finally decide whether they support or oppose me.
 * 2, one has just determined for Support. --PaxEquilibrium 07:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

That seems to be it (although I really, really do not understand the explanation given at User:Thewanderer's vote, I don't get it). --PaxEquilibrium 07:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Another Errabee ...
Again a lot of canvassing against an editor who yes has got a POV (we all have), and yes does not keep out of nationalist POV pushing discussions and editing conflicts, and still keeps calm under difficult circumstances.

So much canvassing, in fact, that some habitual visitors of Requests for Adminship start looking for a reason to vote against. "Gee, this guy is controversial, let's find a stick to hit him with."

With Errabee it was his opinion on Commons that was the stick (never mind that nobody actually believed that he would use his adminship to keep copyright violations on Wikipedia), here it is PaxEquilibrium's lack of comment summaries that is used to thwart him (never mind that precisely because PaxEquilibrium keeps cool during tribal wars he writes a lot on talk pages and many people, like me, do not really think those edits need comment summaries).

It seems like people who get involved in such tribal war discussions have virtually no chance of ever becoming an admin now, though Wikipedia actually needs people who know what the ... it is all about. Never mind that PaxEquilibrium's block log is clean, that Errabee was supported by a Polish editor (not me) and that PaxEquilibrium has people from various quarters in the area who want him to be an admin. Too bad. Too bad. (I write that only twice, because if I wrote it thrice, some nut would find something hidden behind that as well).--Pan Gerwazy 18:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)