Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/President-Wiki-Man

Dugwiki
Just noting that I would be very surprised if the person responding in this RfA is the same person who wrote User:Dugwiki/Surreal numbers and quite apart from the resolution of this RfA I'm a little concerned about the possibility of account impersonation. Alyo (chat·edits) 20:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Per answer to optional question 3, a sockpuppet investigation my be appropriate.-- ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  20:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * For someone with 1.6k mainspace edits with this enthusiastic RfA, I'm willing to WP:AGF. However, a response from themself would be very appreciated. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 20:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree that under these circumstances an SPI is appropriate. Jusdafax (talk) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * A CU check will not find anything on such an old account. –FlyingAce✈hello 21:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, but that wouldn't be the purpose of a check. The candidate mentions using other accounts. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Good point, I missed that part. –FlyingAce✈hello 21:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * See also User talk:President-Wiki-Man. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)