Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Protonk

User:Protonk

run at Wed Oct 15 00:44:35 2008 GMT

Category talk:	7 Category:	9 Image talk:	3 Image:	16 Mainspace	2846 MediaWiki talk:	7 Talk:	1025 Template talk:	23 Template:	56 User talk:	1203 User:	223 Wikipedia talk:	391 Wikipedia:	2526 avg edits per page	2.50 earliest	04:21, 17 April 2008 number of unique pages	3331 total	8335

2008/4 	619 	2008/5  	166 	2008/6  	462 	2008/7  	2049 	2008/8  	2750 	2008/9  	1802 	2008/10 	487

Mainspace 147	Mathematical economics 90	Warhammer 40,000 51	John Emilius Fauquier 43	Los Angeles class submarine 31	Richard A. Houghten 31	Cheshire Cat in popular culture 27	Bloody Sunday (1969) 27	James Wesley Rawles 27	Alvin E. Roth 25	Galaxy Quest 21	Submarine 19	Gary Coleman 19	Panic of 1907 18	Patrick Tyler 17	Adam Smith

Talk: 33	Encyclopedia Dramatica 26	James Wesley Rawles 26	4chan 26	Mathematical economics 23	Adam Smith 22	Sports Chiropractic 22	Tulip mania 19	Charlie Crist 17	Los Angeles class submarine 17	Adam Smith/GA1 16	Galaxy Quest 14	Larry Craig 14	Richard A. Houghten 13	Mr Creosote 12	Deletionpedia

Category: 3	List-Class Economics articles 3	NA-importance Economics articles Image: 2	Bloody Sunday 1969.jpg 2	VCCGB.png 2	John Fauquier.jpg 2	Smith medallion portrait.jpg Image talk: 2	Corbata roja.jpg MediaWiki talk: 4	Spam-whitelist 2	Uploadtext Template: 8	Warhammer 40,000 Project 5	WikiProject September 11, 2001 4	WikiProject Economics 3	Warhammer-40,000-stub 3	User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000 2	Economics 2	Warhammer 40,000 Template talk: 14	Did you know 6	Film 2	Warhammer-40,000-stub User: 103	Protonk 16	Protonk/Rescued 15	Protonk/NAC 11	Protonk/math 8	Protonk/Barnstars 7	NickPenguin/temp 6	Protonk/stats 5	Protonk/To do 4	Petercorless/Carpent tua poma nepotes 4	Protonk/monobook.js 4	Protonk/FPC 3	Casliber/Airplanes in popular culture 3	Protonk/huggle.css 3	Tealwisp/Space Marine Chapters 2	GoldDragon/Weapons of the Imperium (Warhammer 40,000)

User talk: 195	Protonk 97	Keeper76 67	Allemandtando 34	A Nobody 17	DGG 13	Benjiboi 12	Tealwisp/Space Marine Chapters 10	Inclusionist 10	Rossusna02 10	MiltonP Ottawa 10	A Man In Black 9	Thumperward 9	Future Perfect at Sunrise 7	Cretog8 7	PennySeven

Wikipedia: 234	Reliable sources/Noticeboard 105	Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 72	Good article nominations 71	Administrators' noticeboard 59	Administrator intervention against vandalism 37	WikiProject Warhammer 40,000 26	Articles for deletion/Space Battleship Yamato (spaceship) (2nd nomination) 25	Notability/RFC:compromise 19	Articles for deletion/Log/2008 September 6 18	Articles for deletion/Cheshire Cat in popular culture (2nd nomination) 18	Articles for deletion/Goatse.cx (5th nomination) 18	Articles for deletion/Log/2008 September 1 17	Articles for deletion/United Airlines in popular culture 16	WikiProject Warhammer 40,000/Templates 15	Articles for deletion/Hema Sinha (2nd nomination)

Wikipedia talk: 66	Articles for deletion 47	Article Rescue Squadron 32	WikiProject Economics 28	Biographies of living persons 22	Notability/RFC:compromise 22	Deletion policy 20	"In popular culture" articles 14	WikiProject Warhammer 40,000 13	Notability (fiction) 13	WikiProject Video games 11	Editing restrictions/Civility restrictions 9	Requests for adminship 8	Abuse filter 8	Criteria for speedy deletion 7	Deletion process

Comments moved from oppose section

 * 1) Oppose because the candidate came here with bad intentions (how do we know we’re still not being had?), does not seem to understand how admin boards work and venue shopped/escalated tensions during a dispute (see User_talk:Protonk/Archive_1, User_talk:Protonk/Archive_1, and User_talk:Protonk/Archive_1), is too quick to fly off the handle/lose temper for a prospective admin (User_talk:Protonk/Archive_3) and while claiming there that he wanted nothing to do with his opponent followed him around anyway as seen in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stormie/DRV notes and apparently was in no hurry even after that to let things be, has been warned for vandalism, and has engaged in edit warring. Also, look at the earliest edits here.  His immediately jumping into AfDs is also somewhat unusual for a “new” user.--A Nobody 02:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * FYI to curious readers - this editor, A Nobody, is the 3rd name of the editor that Protonk referenced above in his answer to question 3 (conflicts). They have a history of disputes, albeit under the original name of the editor above. You should have no difficulty figuring out his previous names, but he was renamed because of stalking issues (according to him) so I won't say it outright. Avruch  T 02:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, please don't as the concerns do remain to some degree. In any event, I do not wish to renew our past conflicts and hope that we will never have any negative future interactions.  I am saying here what I feel I need to say after everything and will say no more.  I have no wish to pile on or reignite things.  Actually, I don't think that's really likely at this point anyway, as I'm not apt to be around much and I definitely don't have time for the areas in which we had run into past conflict any more.  I really do not trust him as an admin due to our past experiences, although I always hold out hope that anyone can surprise me, and I have no desire to feel any animosity beyond that.  I have said my peace and that is all.  --A Nobody 02:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Anyone who isn't lobotomised would know you by that oppose. Interesting that your personal safety is apparently less important to you than opposing in your normal way. Everyme 04:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Be fair. He's renamed.  He's in good standing.  It doesn't much good to taunt him. Protonk (talk) 04:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * His immediately jumping into AfDs is also somewhat unusual for a “new” user. — So you're basically assuming that he is a sockpuppet of a prior account. Good, nothing better is to expect of you than such baseless allegations. If that's your "peace", I have to say your peace (or piece) sucks ass. Everyme 23:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * C'mon Everyme, leave it. He's made his vote, now let him be. How do you turn this on (talk) 23:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You're right. It's just that I reread his oppose and the assumption of bad faith, and particularly the indirect way in which he incorporates that slandering is ugly. Oh so ugly. Everyme 23:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)