Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan

Edit count for SarekOfVulcan
User:SarekOfVulcan

run at Mon Jun 23 21:36:17 2008 GMT

Category talk:        3 Category:             13 Image talk:           3 Image:                152 Mainspace             5226 MediaWiki talk:       2 Portal talk:          2 Portal:               1 Talk:                 964 Template talk:        8 Template:             26 User talk:            1858 User:                 149 Wikipedia talk:       103 Wikipedia:            1174 avg edits per page    2.28 earliest              06:40, 30 March 2004 number of unique pages 4252 total                 9684

2004/3 3   2004/4  0   2004/5  0   2004/6  0   2004/7  52   2004/8  31   2004/9  20   2004/10 8   2004/11 2   2004/12 11   2005/1  8   2005/2  10   2005/3  11   2005/4  10   2005/5  22   2005/6  38   2005/7  55   2005/8  20   2005/9  28   2005/10 268   2005/11 467   2005/12 945   2006/1  688   2006/2  239   2006/3  11   2006/4  0   2006/5  9   2006/6  61   2006/7  296   2006/8  39   2006/9  31   2006/10 127   2006/11 91   2006/12 26   2007/1  13   2007/2  20   2007/3  22   2007/4  16   2007/5  234   2007/6  574   2007/7  633   2007/8  903   2007/9  854   2007/10 835   2007/11 433   2007/12 601   2008/1  404   2008/2  100   2008/3  20   2008/4  90   2008/5  82   2008/6  223

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red  denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 139 [2]Freemasonry 74 [3]List of Freemasons 62 [4]Herbert W. Armstrong 59 [5]Visual FoxPro 50 [6]International Order of the Rainbow for Girls 50 [7]Bangor, Maine 38 [8]Classical High School 37 [9]Order of the Eastern Star 34 [10]Condom 32 [11]Glenn Greenwald 32 [12]Anti-Masonry 32 [13]Rhode Island 30 [14]DeMolay International 30 [15]Mike Tyson 29 [16]Diane Duane

Talk: 120 [17]Herbert W. Armstrong 116 [18]Freemasonry 37 [19]List of Freemasons 37 [20]Catholicism and Freemasonry 28 [21]Condom 20 [22]Anti-Masonry 19 [23]Knights of Columbus 13 [24]Knights of Columbus/Archive 1 13 [25]Seattle, Washington 11 [26]Order of the Eastern Star 10 [27]Rosa Parks 10 [28]Visual FoxPro 10 [29]Taxil hoax 10 [30]Roman Catholic Church 8  [31]Ted Stevens

Category talk: 2 [32]Roman Catholic Wikipedians

Category: 3 [33]Catholic Wikipedians 2 [34]Roman Catholic Wikipedians 2 [35]Wikipedian clarinetists-4

Image: 7 [36]AtwaterDulcimer.jpg 5 [37]VisualFoxProScreenshot.png 5 [38]DeepW.jpg 4 [39]Inara Serra1.jpg 3 [40]Cover 091907.gif 3 [41]Orono Maine seal.jpg 3 [42]Book of Night with Moon.gif 3 [43]HighW.jpg 3 [44]PikePlaceMarketCrowd.jpg 3 [45]FireflySimonTam1.jpg 3 [46]JayneCobb.jpg 3 [47]Ff kaylee.jpg 3 [48]MalReynoldsFirefly.JPG 3 [49]S618 Spike.png 3 [50]Oes GGC color.PNG

MediaWiki talk: 2 [51]Bad image list

Portal talk: 2 [52]Ice hockey

Template: 9 [53]Young Wizards 2 [54]Clarinet 2 [55]Template sandbox 2 [56]Magazine rationale

Template talk: 3 [57]Non-free promotional

User: 85 [58]SarekOfVulcan 17 [59]SarekOfVulcan/monobook.js  7  [60]SarekOfVulcan/Admin coaching 7 [61]KJVTRUTH 5 [62]Lightbringer 2 [63]Vitamin a

User talk: 176 [64]SarekOfVulcan 24 [65]Chooserr 14 [66]Lisasmall 10 [67]StevenBlack 9  [68]Jebbrady 8  [69]Punk-Lova 8  [70]Skull 'n' Femurs 7  [71]DonaNobisPacem 7  [72]Shell Kinney 7  [73]RelHistBuff 7  [74]Airevgeny 7  [75]Fang Aili/Archive20 7  [76]AcadiaMagic 7  [77]Adrian.walker 6  [78]Angel David

Wikipedia: 49 [79]Requests for page protection 43 [80]Administrator intervention against vandalism 38 [81]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 36 [82]Administrators' noticeboard 22 [83]Requests for comment/Jebbrady 19 [84]Requests for arbitration/Lightbringer/Workshop 17 [85]Village pump (assistance) 17 [86]Articles for deletion/Democracy & Nature 16 [87]Wikiquette alerts 15 [88]Articles for deletion/Elf Sternberg (2nd nomination) 14 [89]Articles for deletion/Brianna Rieffel (second nomination) 14 [90]Articles for deletion/Lake Ontario Waterkeeper 13 [91]Village pump (policy) 12 [92]Articles for deletion/Clanton, Mississippi 11 [93]Articles for deletion/Log/2007 September 25

Wikipedia talk: 13 [94]AutoWikiBrowser 7 [95]WikiProject Freemasonry 6 [96]Requests for comment 4 [97]Twinkle 4 [98]WikiProject Star Trek 3 [99]Non-free content criteria/Proposal 3 [100]WikiProject Judaism 3 [101]AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage 3 [102]Requests for comment/Jebbrady 3 [103]Notability (music) 2 [104]Citing sources 2 [105]WikiProject Science Fiction 2 [106]WikiProject Rhode Island 2 [107]Notability (people) 2 [108]Article Rescue Squadron

If there were any problems, please [109]email Interiot or post at  [110]User talk:Interiot.


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 21:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC).

Power-hungry wannabes
Moved from oppose section:


 * Kurt, can you provide a real reason to oppose? Self nominations are explicitly allowed.   Bringing your disgruntlement with the RFA process into individual cases is WP:POINT in my opinion.  Jehochman Talk 01:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't use that blue link.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 01:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Bureaucrats approve adminship by not only the votes, but more of general consensus. By the way, I found it humorous when people contradict themselves =) Aquarius &#149; talk 04:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Aquarius, do not insult Kurt with that line. It's been two years since that RfA, and you are not assuming good faith with that comment in any way whatsoever. &mdash;Dark talk 07:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Kurt Weber has been assuming bad faith on the part of self-noms for years now, while Aquarius makes one comment and gets jumped on. As a former bureaucrat I would completely ignore any vote with this type of reason (and, as well, any oppose vote with no reason given) so it's not a big deal anyway. ugen64 (talk) 17:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Kurts views are common knowledge at RfA, something i am suprised you weren't aware of before nominating yourself. But neway, there are many who disagree with kurt, i am one of them. What everyone does should and mostly do agree on is that he has a view, and a reason to oppose and is entitled to give it here. Sedd&sigma;n talk Editor Review 18:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I know that Kurt's account is not a SPA; however I disagree with this, this and this, as there is no change on the reason. The last time I told Kurt to stop this, Wisdom89 insulted me, telling me to be careful when using the troll term. Let's have an example of a RfA troll account: Amorde2 always opposes to RfAs in the Spanish Wikipedia (see example here; there are plenty more). Kurt is very similar, with the difference that he only opposes only to self-nom RfAs. My suggestion would be to tell Kurt to stop this or being on the risk of getting blocked. macy talk 19:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Not quite true, he opposes admin-coached RFAs as well. In any case, it's clear he's entrenched in his opinion and he rarely responds to discussion regarding it. Someone should shuffle this discussion off to the talk page. – xenocidic  ( talk ) 19:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This is a subject we shouldn't be quarrelling over any more. It's a very dated subject matter. There was one of a number of large-scale and high profile debates about this months ago, in which I was involved, and no-one should be made to go through it again. Nothing will change as a result of this, so "be what may".  Lra drama 20:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Totally agree. Tan   |   39  20:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)