Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Shaddack

I'm unhappy that Shaddack has changed an improved version of the Acrylamide article back to a previous one without any explaination. This is not how a potential administrator should behave, especially when you read the 'mottos' on his page. Although I read Wikipedia a lot and as a reader am very grateful for all the hard work people have put in in making it, I am sorry I do not at the moment have the time to sign up and become a proper contributer due to several other urgent comitments. Thanks very much. droid.


 * Please check the Acrylamide article history and Talk page where this issue is addressed and my changes are visible. Mr. droid, you may like to clarify how wikifying an article counts as "changing back" and what exactly you do not like. --Shaddack 15:09, 20 November 2005 (UTC)