Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Shoessss 2

Edit count for Shoessss
User:Shoessss

run at Mon Jun 30 16:06:21 2008 GMT

Category talk:        2 Category:             9 Help:                 1 Image talk:           2 Image:                6 Mainspace             3369 Portal talk:          1 Portal:               8 Talk:                 175 Template talk:        6 Template:             10 User talk:            3058 User:                 138 Wikipedia talk:       33 Wikipedia:            1618 avg edits per page    1.56 earliest              17:01, 15 November 2006 number of unique pages 5416 total                 8436

2006/11 39  2006/12 826   2007/1  969   2007/2  31   2007/3  209   2007/4  216   2007/5  1290   2007/6  914   2007/7  466   2007/8  228   2007/9  12   2007/10 15   2007/11 62   2007/12 480   2008/1  722   2008/2  691   2008/3  614   2008/4  189   2008/5  291   2008/6  172

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red  denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 82 [2]Banishment in the Bible 41 [3]Murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom 38 [4]Parkwood, Philadelphia 17 [5]Julia Allison 15 [6]Attack on Pearl Harbor 15 [7]Pearl Harbor 13 [8]Carlos Mencia 13 [9]Sophienkirche 12 [10]Frank Hague 12 [11]Hopkins-Nanjing Center 11 [12]Franklin Mills 9 [13]Lester Basil Sinclair 9 [14]Parkwood, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 9 [15]The Red Lion Inn - Bensalem, PA   8  [16]Oei Tiong Ham

Talk: 44 [17]Murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom 21 [18]Heather Wilson 3 [19]Parkwood, Philadelphia 2 [20]U.S. Route 1 2 [21]Peter Mortimer (rugby league) 2 [22]After Dark (Washington University in St. Louis) 2 [23]Sophienkirche 2 [24]Leonard Pitts 2 [25]Hopkins-Nanjing Center 2 [26]The Black Crochan 2 [27]DeAngelo Hall 2 [28]Julia Allison 2 [29]Northeast Philadelphia 2 [30]Taftville 2 [31]Pentatonality

Category talk: 2 [32]National Geographic Society

Category: 4 [33]American Episcopalians

Image: 2 [34]Japanisches palais.jpg

Image talk: 2 [35]Japanisches palais.jpg

Portal: 2 [36]Africa

Template: 4 [37]AFDWarning

Template talk: 6 [38]Did you know

User: 84 [39]Shoessss 5 [40]Shoessss/Edit Count 4 [41]DGG 4 [42]Shoessss/barnstars 2 [43]Guest9999/Archive 1 2 [44]JoshEdgar 2 [45]Mesagie 2 [46]Tj McCorkis 2 [47]Bbren

User talk: 284 [48]Shoessss 26 [49]DGG 10 [50]Tone/Archive 7 9  [51]Edgar181/Archive8 8  [52]AniMate 7  [53]Daniel 7  [54]Pedro 7  [55]Urdna 7  [56]Simplemines 6  [57]72.185.97.47   6   [58]Miranda 6  [59]Tone/Archive 9 6  [60]Therefore 6  [61]Dlohcierekim 6  [62]67.171.170.241

Wikipedia: 455 [63]Suspected copyright violations 65 [64]Administrator intervention against vandalism 14 [65]Editor review/Shoessss 14 [66]Articles for deletion/Homer E. Woodling 13 [67]Requests for adminship/Kakofonous 11 [68]Requests for adminship/Jouster 11 [69]Articles for deletion/Banishment in the Bible 10 [70]Articles for deletion/Cooneyites 10 [71]Requests for adminship/TenPoundHammer 5 8  [72]Requests for adminship/EyeSerene 8  [73]Administrators' noticeboard 7  [74]Articles for deletion/The Chickadees 7  [75]Deletion review/Log/2008 April 23 7  [76]Requests for adminship/Shoessss 7  [77]Articles for deletion/Wambui Otieno

Wikipedia talk: 9 [78]Requests for adminship 8 [79]Articles for deletion 7 [80]Requests for adminship/Kakofonous 2 [81]Articles for deletion/RiceRokit 2 [82]Articles for deletion/Cupids (club)

If there were any problems, please [83]email Interiot or post at  [84]User talk:Interiot.


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 16:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC).

Discussion

 * I probably shouldn't vote (since you were the first to oppose my most recent RFA) but I don't believe that your oppose in that RFA was appropriate. With regards to my lack of experience, there's no real problem with what you said.  The problem was that you accused the nominator of "playing with people's emotions".  I'm wondering how quick as an administrator you would be to make that sort of comment. &mdash;  scetoaux (T | C)  18:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey "scetoaux (T | C), first, always feel free to express your opinion.  As you can see, by both sides of the discussion here, I do.  And honestly, that is the only way you get to know the person and to form an opinion of that individual.  Second, with regards to my soapbox comments, I still agree with them, but will not address it here, as I knew what I was getting involved with.   Take care. ShoesssS Talk 19:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, this is a minor point, but I feel that some of your formatting is a bit less proper. The indentation above was a little excessive, and your edit summary was almost indecipherable. &mdash;  scetoaux (T | C)  20:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I personally think voting neutral in RfA is stupid since we have this section up here, but yeah, I am neutral. On the one hand most of the opposition seems to be per RfA voting (most; there are some other good points which I will look into at some stage). Frankly, I think this is ridiculous, and it smells strongly of grudge-opposition. This is nowhere near the first time one particular user has engaged in this behaviour. People have talk pages, folks. If you disagree with their actions, take it to their talk page and ask them to change, don't save it up for their RfA—that's really low. —Giggy 09:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * What is *low* is your continuous snide comments in my direction. I can see you haven't bothered to read the opposes properly, otherwise you'd see it's not "grudge-opposition". The only person with any kind of grudge round here is yourself.  Al Tally  talk  12:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If it were as easy as telling you both to stop bickering and move on, I would certainly do so. Al Tally, if you simply refuse to respond to what you perceive as Giggy's snide comments towards you (whether actual or perceived only by you, I cannot tell), then he'd probably stop for a lack of audience.  Giggy, please refrain from accusing the opposition of being a grudge-opposition.  That's not exactly in-line with our policy of assuming good faith, which I'm sure you know well enough.
 * I think both of you need to get off each-other's backs for a little while. Go write some articles, or fight some vandalism. &mdash;  scetoaux (T | C)  17:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)