Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Werdna 3

Edit count for Werdna
User:Werdna

run at Wed May 21 06:15:44 2008 GMT

Category:             1 Help:                 1 Image:                5 Mainspace             1342 Portal:               33 Talk:                 82 Template talk:        1 Template:             75 User talk:            1320 User:                 165 Wikipedia talk:       145 Wikipedia:            1530 avg edits per page    1.84 earliest              01:53, 25 July 2005 number of unique pages 2549 total                 4700

2005/7  3 2005/8   73 2005/9   28 2005/10  7 2005/11  61 2005/12  79 2006/1   674 2006/2   77 2006/3   472 2006/4   308 2006/5   348 2006/6   184 2006/7   135 2006/8   89 2006/9   302 2006/10  233 2006/11  20 2006/12  45 2007/1   94 2007/2   28 2007/3   1 2007/4   2 2007/5   0 2007/6   0 2007/7   0 2007/8   1 2007/9   0 2007/10  0 2007/11  11 2007/12  27 2008/1   5 2008/2   25 2008/3   203 2008/4   778 2008/5   387

(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes edits without an edit summary)

Mainspace 44 Knox Grammar School 23 Spring project 19 Weapons in Deus Ex 9 List of warez groups 8 Korean War 7 Western Reserve Academy 7 History of Australia 7 Speech Application Programming Interface 7 CityRail 7 Deus Ex 7  List of common file extensions 6 Penis 6 Far Away 5 Northern Ireland Virtual Tissue Archive 5 Bandwidth test

Talk: 4 Teratophilia 4 History of the board game Monopoly 4 Daniel Pearl 3 Knox Grammar School 3 Deus Ex 3 Qur'an 3 Charles Kingsford Smith 2 Peter F. Paul 2 Laser applications 2 Apollo Moon Landing hoax conspiracy theories 2 DotNetNuke 2 Linda Frum 2 Far Away (Ayumi Hamasaki song) 2 Pinhole camera 2 Hannover 96

Portal: 6 Harry Potter 6 Harry Potter/Selected article 4 Scientology/Intro 3 Harry Potter/Things you can do 2 Harry Potter/WikiProjects 2 Harry Potter/Selected picture

Template: 32 Werdnabot 5 AR report 4 Prod-notability 4 Werdnabot/doc 4 Vandalism information 4 Resume 2 Highrfc-loop 2 Cent 2 Welcomeg 2 Check talk 2 Usercheck

User: 32 Werdna/monobook.js 17 Werdna/sig.js 5 Werdna/Test 5 Werdna 4 Werdnabot/Interface/Archivefromsummary 4 Scepia/novanity 4 Werdna/huggle.css 4 Werdnabot/Interface/Timestampregex 4 Werdnabot/Interface/Months 4 Werdnabot/Interface/Archivetosummary 4 Werdna/nofakemessages.js 4  Werdnabot/Interface/Syntax 4 Kmweber/Adminship 3 Werdnabot/Interface/Incrementsummary 3 Werdnabot/Interface/Timestampmonthtype

User talk: 313 Werdna 18 AmiDaniel 16 Jimbo Wales 13 Werdna648/Archive/Archive 01 12 202.182.131.21 11  Tawker 10 MarcyuOld1 9  147.10.153.84 8   Phaedriel 8  InShaneee 8  Werdna648/Archive 7  Mister Pibbles 7  Coren/Bot policy 7  King of Hearts 6  198.110.50.253

Wikipedia: 72 Bots/Requests for approval 60 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 57 Village pump (technical) 45 Administrator intervention against vandalism 34 Requests for adminship/TawkerbotTorA 31 Administrators' noticeboard 29 Requests for adminship/Werdna648 19 Village pump (policy) 19 Articles for deletion/Daniel Brandt (3rd nomination) 19 Bots/Requests for approval/Approved 17 Requests for adminship/Werdna 2 16 Requests for adminship/Werdna 16 Requests for comment/Lupo 15 Requests for adminship/Werdna648 2 14 Blocking policy proposal

Wikipedia talk: 45 Requests for adminship 11 Bot Approvals Group 11 Bots/Requests for approval 8 Bot policy 7 Requests for adminship/ProtectionBot 6 RFA as RFC/Werdna 6 Automatic edit summaries 6 Blocking policy proposal 5 RFA as RFC 5 Requests for comment/Lupo 4 Requests for adminship/TawkerbotTorA 4 Criteria for speedy deletion 3 Requests for adminship/Werdna648 2 3 IP block exemption 3 Requests for comment/Linuxbeak

If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot . Based directly on these URLs: [1]


 * The edit count was retrieved from this link at 06:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC).

Harassment


I'm being abused and harassed for my oppose vote, despite its solid reasoning and my willingness to patiently defend it in good faith. I'd like Mike Halterman to be ejected from this discussion. --Duk 13:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Stop, drop the club and slowly walk away from the horse carcass. henrik  • talk  14:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Um, no? - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * It was dreadful reasoning. I hope the closing bureaucrat ignores it, and your bad faith comments.  Al Tally  talk  16:43, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hahahahahahahahaha. Oh, Jesus. Ejected? I don't know what to say, other than laughter, at this point. Mike H. Fierce! 18:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Respect other's voice in the discussion
Even if you strongly disagree with another user, please respect their voice in the discussion. Wikipedia needs users to weigh in and state their opinion, even if unpopular, if we are going to make sound decisions. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 22:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Even if the vote is made in bad faith, unhelpful to the discussion, and irrelevant about whether the candidate will make a good admin? That's the case with this one.  Al Tally  talk  22:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it is fine to make a rebuttal comment or two, but I don't think it is wise to stifle discussion or disparage a comment made when the user is discussing a legitimate concern. I'm talking to both side here. The 'crats are well able to read comments and decide how much weight to give to them. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 22:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * That's something that applies to Duk as much as to everybody else who disagreed with his comment. Duk, in making a comment that is in no way related to the candidate, but rather, which continues a festering disagreement he has with a completely separate individual, is not respecting the comments made by over 150 editors which are based on the candidate in question (be they supporting, opposing or neutral viewpoints). I remain deeply disappointed that a user would choose an RfA to continue a rather short and fairly pointless dispute about bot policy, especially given the previously high regard that user was held in by the community. Nick (talk) 23:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, everyone needs to back off, I think. Positions are clear. I'm highly skeptical that any benefit will come from further comments about this matter. This discussion has gone far off track. I'm done commenting myself. Good night, all. ;-) FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 23:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Nick, you are wrong to say my oppose is in no way related to the candidate. It was based solely on the candidate and his behavior - I explained in depth how and why. --Duk 02:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Al tally Majorly, my vote was made in good faith. I felt that Werdna shirked his duty and blew me off. That's why I opposed. This has to do with Werdna and no other person or dispute. --Duk 02:03, 26 May 2008 (UTC)