Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Wtmitchell

Editing stats for Wtmitchell at 07:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC): Username: Wtmitchell User groups: rollbacker First edit: Nov 17, 2004 08:03:43 Unique articles edited: 10,402 Average edits per page: 2.05 Total edits (including deleted): 21,333 Deleted edits: 89 Live edits: 21,244

Namespace totals Article 12863 60.55% Talk 1410 6.64% User 668 3.14% User talk 4806 22.62% Wikipedia 649 3.05% Wikipedia talk 464 2.18% File 2 0.01% File talk 3 0.01% MediaWiki talk 1 0.00% Template 237 1.12% Template talk 138 0.65% Category 1 0.00% Portal 2 0.01%

Month counts 2004/11 3 2004/12 0  2005/01 0  2005/02 0  2005/03 3  2005/04 0  2005/05 1  2005/06 0  2005/07 0  2005/08 2  2005/09 1  2005/10 0  2005/11 0  2005/12 0  2006/01 0  2006/02 0  2006/03 0  2006/04 0  2006/05 0  2006/06 16  2006/07 33  2006/08 64  2006/09 217  2006/10 126  2006/11 192  2006/12 149  2007/01 125  2007/02 127  2007/03 195  2007/04 228  2007/05 443  2007/06 674  2007/07 345  2007/08 259  2007/09 392  2007/10 465  2007/11 183  2007/12 490  2008/01 484  2008/02 340  2008/03 365  2008/04 410  2008/05 579  2008/06 177  2008/07 176  2008/08 451  2008/09 510  2008/10 313  2008/11 230  2008/12 321  2009/01 457  2009/02 429  2009/03 2382  2009/04 3270  2009/05 4327  2009/06 1290

Logs Pages moved: 51 Pages patrolled: 15 Files uploaded: 6

Top edited articles Article •155 - Conscription •125 - Philippine–American_War •125 - Boracay •108 - History_of_the_Philippines_(1898–1946) •93 - Subic_rape_case •93 - Filipino_people •91 - Philippines •88 - Separation_of_church_and_state •82 - History_of_the_Philippines •77 - Dog_meat

Talk •34 - United_States •32 - Spanish_language_in_the_Philippines •31 - Puerto_Rico •29 - Filipino_people •26 - Dog/Archive_4 •26 - Philippines •25 - List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_tota... •23 - Boracay •22 - List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population •21 - Dog_meat

User •353 - Wtmitchell/Draft1 •65 - Wtmitchell/Sandbox •55 - Wtmitchell •42 - Wtmitchell/Work1 •41 - Wtmitchell/Draft2 •36 - Wtmitchell/monobook.css •22 - Wtmitchell/monobook.js •13 - Wtmitchell/Draft3 •7 - Netscott/Spanish_ethnicity •6 - Wtmitchell/Work2

User talk •171 - Wtmitchell •6 - RossPatterson •6 - SallyScot •5 - Christopher_Sundita •5 - Wtmitchell/Archive_3_(2009) •5 - Sky_Harbor •5 - Angelo_De_La_Paz •5 - Evertype •5 - 70.181.237.3 •4 - Ssdeleter

Wikipedia •132 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism •90 - Huggle/Whitelist •51 - Village_pump_(technical) •41 - Village_pump_(proposals) •28 - Citing_sources •25 - Sandbox/Archive •20 - Intensive_Care_Unit •18 - Sandbox •14 - Footnotes •9 - Reliable_sources

Wikipedia talk •153 - Citing_sources •51 - Footnotes •47 - Verifiability •40 - Tambayan_Philippines •30 - Reliable_sources •21 - Layout •14 - Intensive_Care_Unit •10 - Naming_conventions •9 - Twinkle •8 - Citation_templates

File •1 - Katagalugan_Republic_Flag.gif •1 - K-219_map.PNG

File talk •2 - Sakay.jpg •1 - Ph_physical_map.png

MediaWiki talk •1 - Spam-blacklist

Template •56 - X8 •43 - X9 •26 - Template_sandbox •26 - X1 •16 - X5 •15 - X2 •7 - X7 •5 - Wikitravel •4 - X6 •3 - Strong

Template talk •53 - Citation •25 - Ref •13 - Cite_web •10 - Infobox_Country •8 - Wikitravel •4 - Shortcut •4 - Policy_shortcut •3 - Notice •3 - Span •2 - Ref_label

Category •1 - Festivals_in_France

Portal •1 - War/Featured_picture/5 •1 - Current_events/2008_October_6

Moved "gotta have one oppose" discussion
The following discussion thread has nothing to do with the candidate, so I've removed it (had it been one or two lines, I may have left it, but this is a ridiculous amount of text for what amounts to a joke. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 02:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Quite unnecessary really but whatever blows your skirt up... - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 02:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The same could be said about the entire thread itself. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 02:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, EVula. Nothing but a totally unnecessary distraction for the amusement of the original jokester. Tan   &#124;   39  04:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh noz! The cabal hath spoken! *rolls eyes* - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 06:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose 'Cause you gotta have at least 1. ;] - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 21:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * May I indent this vote? – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not if it makes Oppose = 0. Otherwise, sure. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 21:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This joke oppose creates a misleading tally, which is extremely unfair to the candidate. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with Julian completely. Put yourself in the neutral column if you want to jokingly object to the candidate. Otherwise, I'm going to remove this.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 21:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * How is this less of a valid reason than "why not"? It's not misleading, it's an oppose vote. If you want to discuss it with the editor, you're welcome to do so here or (as I would suggest) on their talk page. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not valid simply because the editor in question isn't being serious. It's not like we're talking about mystifying stuff here. All supports, even moral ones serve a purpose and have a meaning. This one does not.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 22:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Those who monitor these elections know to ignore votes such as this, and a "1" in the oppose column is actually a very good message to the candidate. It says, there's no good reason to oppose you, as evidenced by the silly vote. The best reply to such as vote it simply, "Thank you for your vote". -GTBacchus(talk) 22:57, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wisdom, I have found your name to be appropriate, but in this particular case I'm uncomfortable with your acting as judge and jury on which votes have "meaning". I understand your concern, and I am sympathetic to the case made for objective standards, as in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance for an objective standard of "beauty", but I think we have to let some things go. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:15, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I lol'd. It's just harmless humor, you guys. Worse things have happened to better people. It's a little dickish to do if the guy's got a clean oppose section, but it's not worth a drama-fest.-- Koji †  23:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I had a single oppose vote, and it was ridiculous. I didn't find it dickish at all, in that I'm proud of it. A single ridiculous oppose vote is a better indication of my fitness than any 30 support votes. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Let the record reflect that GTBacchus has a master's in new math. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Geez, didn't realize it was that big of a deal. Just to note, no one is 100% perfect so even in that thought, 1 oppose is certainly warranted. If it makes anyone feel better, I'll state such next to the oppose !vote. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 01:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm in ur rfa's, fixing ur tallies.  Sy  n 01:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Zactly. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here @ 01:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Let the closing bureaucrat determine the validity of this !vote. This drama is unnecessary. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  08:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Allstarecho stated we may indent this opposition as long as it does not make the opposes = 0; since there is now an opposition by Keepscases, I am indenting Allstarecho's opposition. Kingturtle (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So unnecessary... but if it makes you happy. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That is why I indented it in the first place, though Allstarecho reverted it. I'm honestly considering just archiving the whole damn thread, though. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 17:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Typo in my neutral
Was just looking over the archived RFA and I noticed a typo in my Neutral vote. When I said I didn't like the answer to Question 13, I actually meant to say 12 (the one about rights). Just wanted to make it clear, but I don't want to edit the archived discussion. Congrats on passing, Wtmitchell Firestorm  Talk 22:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)