Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Artaxerex/Evidence

Moved from Artaxarex's evidence section
My original comment with working links can be found here. Let me just make clear that Artaxerex does not deserve to be banned. Although he did make some mistakes initially when he first joined wikipedia, many of the subsequents accusations against him are unfair. I am very impressed with his knowledge about the subjects he edits and hope he will continue at wikipedia. --- Melca 19:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Dear Dfitzgerald please provide your reasons for deleting sourced materials
You are arguing that all the materials that I have provided were rejected by a consensus from other editors. If you are an Irishman, as you claim you are, you must be aware that there is a need for the voicing of the opposite views, even if they are held by a minority (this has been the conventional practice in the west since the days of enlightenment.)

I am very surprised that you have been acting like Mehrshad123, and the rest of those Iranian editors who try to eliminate any well-sourced historical negative points about the Reza, and Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Please read the historical references that I have provided and if you have any valid source for their rebuttals please provide them. Respectfully Yours Artaxerex 21:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)