Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/BigDaddy777/Proposed decision

Time for proposed decisions
I'm trying not to rush the arbs but I just don't see BD patiently waiting for us to finish this. --Woohookitty 04:51, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Common mistakes?
I'm unclear on what part of removing critical comments from talk and user talk pages constitutes a "common mistake". NatusRoma 01:44, 22 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Because it's against the guidelines of Wikipedia. Not the policies, but the generally accepted guidelines. It doesn't exactly foster collaboration when someone is constantly removing critical comments from their talk page. People do not "own" their talk page and that's a very common mistake. People think they have some sort of possession over it when in fact, they don't. --Woohookitty 02:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Just so you know
I left this on Fred's page as well. BD is using an IP addy of 68.42.141.76 to get around his banishment. It needs to be added to the sanctions. He's the only one using it from what I can see here. --Woohookitty 04:59, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

To the Arbcom members
Thank you for continuing this Arbcom case to its natural conclusion rather than simply letting RedWolf's indefinite ban conclude the matter, as I feel the dispute resolution process and the extensive work that went into it was respected. --kizzle 20:34, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I'll 2nd that. I know that at times, Wikipedia is criticized for not taking care of bad actors like BD777, but in this case, I think the matter was handled just right and I want to thank the arbcom members as well. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 22:19, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * It will always amaze me that he somehow caused all of this destruction in just over a month. 400 pieces of evidence in just a month. Most barely do that many edits a month! Just glad he's gone. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 23:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)