Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Blu Aardvark/Workshop

Relevance of proposals
A significant number of the proposals, such as principles 2-5 and remedy 3, are completely irrelevant if the question before the Committee is "Should Blu Aardvark be banned?" If such actions are to be questioned they should go through the proper dispute resolution channels (such as the current RFC about Linuxbeak) and, if needed, their own Arbitration case. Kotepho 22:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The arbcomm is not limited to the complaint as narrowly construed, and has never been shy about broadening the scope of a case. Guettarda 22:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Be that as it may, at least two Arbitrators have expressed the view that the scope of this case should be narrow. Kotepho 22:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * If the ArbCom decides to keep the case's purview narrow, they'll obviously throw out all the irrelevant principles/remedies. This is a workshop, you know.  :) —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 01:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)