Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Enviroknot

Refactored

 * 1) Process is a sham; I'll tell others.
 * 2) Cliquish, bad faith refusal to communicate, abuse of power
 * 3) "Enviroknot answered David Gerard who said he didn't care and blocked Enviroknot from Wikien-l as well as blocking me for criticizing Gerard. ... I didn't use my real account.

Full text
Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on the discussion page WHERE WE WILL NEVER BOTHER LOOKING AND IF ANYTHING ACTAULLY GOES THERE WE'LL JUST BLANK IT.

RAUL654 the ArbCom Vandal has blanked the discussion page.

He refuses to answer good-faith questions about this bullshit, bad-faith rfar.

This whole thing is a sham.

It's an rfar against kainthescion/elkabong. Enviroknot has nothing to do with them yet you arbcom bad faith morons are signing judgements only on enviroknot.

This is beyond fucking stupid and into the realm of complete abuse of power. I hope you fuckers are happy you're driving so many editors away.

Every time i see a new user i'm going to point them to this case and warn them that it's just not worth risking having to deal with wikipedia's incestuous rulers in adminship and arbcom.

Comment
The page is locked because the ArbCom shitheads are abusing their authority, refusing to answer questions, and dealing entirely in bad faith by inserting an unrelated user into an RFAr case and pronouncing judgement on him while not even discussing the original reason for the RFAr case.

This is pure horse shit and they just want to cover it up. Fuck them. I'll stop when they start acting in good faith.

They refuse to answer questions here, they refuse to answer emails, they block the questions from Wikien-l, this is all the honest users of Wikipedia have left. Long Live the Wiki Reich! Heil Gerard! Heil Gerard!


 * I'm not on the arbcom. I locked the page 10 minutes ago and will unlock it in 5 minutes. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 14:51, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)


 * Please list un-answered questions here. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 14:52, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't mean you but the ArbCom fucks and their toady Calton need a fucking wakeup call. This is completely fucking ridiculous and their response has been to ignore any and all questions. The random insertion of an innocent and unasssociated user into an RFAr is beyond bullshit. How about I insert your name into Zivinbudas's RFAr, or maybe Yuber's? That would be the same shit they pulled here.


 * Could you be more specific? -- Uncle Ed (talk) 15:04, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)


 * Ed, don't waste your time. It's not just that the anonymous IP keeps making the feeble claim that he's not Enviroknot as he goes vandalizing away, but that his underlying claim is documentably false: see this posting and this posting by David Gerard about the user being a sockpuppet. Just block him and be done with it. --Calton | Talk 15:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Who is enviroknot and where can I read more about this? -- Uncle Ed (talk) 15:12, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)


 * User:Enviroknot is a sockpuppet of User:KaintheScion. See Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al. for more details. --Calton | Talk 15:21, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)