Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Freestylefrappe/Evidence

RfC conduct
I honestly did, and still honestly do, believe that adding additional material to an ongoing RfC is appropriate when that material is relevant. (It could result in difficulties, so when I added material (to a very new RfC) that I thought substantively changed the statement, I actually dropped messages to all the previous endorsers.) I have asked before, and am now asking again, for Freestylefrappe to provide a link or a diff to the policy on RfC's that says new material can't be added, period.

Also, can I request that if anyone is going to accuse me of lying, that proof of some kind be provided? It seems courteous. If the problem is that I've only presented one side of the evidence&mdash;for example, showing that Freestylefrappe removed a policy from his own RfC without discussing his claimed rationale&mdash;then anyone can provide the other side. That's why everyone can edit the page. Me, I'm the complaining witness; my obligation is to tell the truth and describe the problem as I see it, not to present both sides of the issue. -- SCZenz 22:22, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * How honorable of you...Your attempt to be the wounded dog is failing miserably. My evidence clearly shows your lies. freestylefrappe 22:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Do you realize that you're shooting yourself in the foot? Now's the time to admit your faults, not to continue making personal attacks.--Sean|Bla ck 22:35, 24 December 2005 (UTC)