Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/His excellency/Workshop

A suggestion
I've said this a few times, but please look at prior cases. Very few of the proposed decisions and proposed principles have any chance of being accepted. Both have to be based on either arcom precedents or on a Wikipedia policy or guideline. In other words, they don't just make them up. --Woohookitty(meow) 06:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I am tempted to describe them as page flooding. Perhaps, after reading 100 pages of threaded discussion, one will forget what led to this case to begin with.  I'd like to forward a motion to dismiss irrelevant evidence and proposals.  Is this allowed?Timothy Usher 08:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Not the evidences I have provided actually. ;) --Aminz 08:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Suggestion
Sections "Pecher has repeatedly misinterpreted textual sources" and "Removing or suppressing sourced material by Pecher" to be merged with "Pecher's POV bias is disruptive to Wikipedia". Any feedback? --Aminz 08:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * No. His Excellency... 21:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I suggested that because of the above comment: "Very few of the proposed decisions and proposed principles have any chance of being accepted. Both have to be based on either arcom precedents or on a Wikipedia policy or guideline. In other words, they don't just make them up."--Aminz 22:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * By merging, I mean having a section and several subsections. --Aminz 22:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It's best to keep them separate. If each point can be adequately supported with evidence, I see no reason why they'd be excluded. His Excellency... 23:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I am just afraid they wouldn't be accepted since they may not based on either arcom precedents or on a Wikipedia policy or guideline. But I am not sure. --Aminz 23:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The workshop page is being abused and I'm going to report it to one of the arbcom members. 39 findings of fact? At some point it becomes POV pushing. And sorry H.E. but the arbcom doesn't commend people or do most of the other things you seem to want them to do. --Woohookitty(meow) 10:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The workshop page has itself become merely another Wikipedia-provided forum from which the user operating under the username "His excellency" is invited to disseminate his baseless personal attacks.Timothy Usher 10:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)