Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Iloveminun/Proposed decision

Additional harassing sockpuppets
See Requests for checkuser/Case/Iloveminun for allegation that this user has created two new harassing doplegangers of HighwayCello. Please checkuser and note if confirmed. Thatcher131 16:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * It's just another one, the other 2 were made a week before. H ig hway Batman! 16:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Minun


Imposter of User:HighwayCello, Minun has created other imposter accounts, noted at Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Minun and Category:Imposters of HighwayCello. User has had heavy sockpuppet usage. H ig hway Batman! 15:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 15:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Note the name appears the same, but has to capital I's, instead of two Ls. H ig hway Batman! 15:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

HighwayCeIIo HighwayCello

Stopped
I stopped doing these things about a coule of weeks ago &mdash; M in  un    Spiderman  10:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Note from User:Minun on proposed decision page

 * Not to users: I don't know if this is the right place to state this, but I justthink its important you know this : I've stopped doing thesr things (about 1-2 weeks ago) and am making good edits, please ask a couple of other editors, particulary the ones who commented on my talk pahge (including the archives) and the Pokémon Collaborative Project. I am about to apologize to HighwayCello, im being truthful about this, so please read my contributions, cheers &mdash; M in un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 18:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I apologized &mdash; M  in un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Crossposted to arbitrators' talk page &mdash; M in un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I promise i'll stop incivilty to HighwayCello (and other users involved in the case) and stop sockpuppetry, no blocks/bans are neccesary, I promise i'll stop, and if I don't, you can ban me, but I will, I promise &mdash; M in un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 14:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I must agree that Minun has completely stopped the actions that got him this ArbCom case. He is now, in my opinion, a model Wikipedian.  ~ crazytales  56297  -talk- 20:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I've been avoiding jumping in here, but "two weeks ago" is after there were already 3 votes for a one year ban, and the imposter account HighwayCeIIo was created after the one year ban was proposed by Fred. The last chance for a really meaningful and effective apology was June 14, before the arbitration committee voted to accept the case. Thatcher131 (talk) 10:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * But I really have stopped &mdash; M in un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 11:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with the details of this case, but I have to say that the time to "plead guilty and make restitution in the hopes of a lighter sentence" would be, ideally as Thatcher says, before the case began, but at any rate, certainly before it's essentially run its course. (I believe there were 6 or 8 remedies passing 6-0, and two votes to close, at the time of said intervention from Minun.  That's more than a little last-gasp.)  I'm also somewhat concerned by comments like this.  If what he "knows to do" is appeal to the arbcom and/or cease editing during the ban, fair enough, but otherwise...  Alai 23:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I was talking about how I can get the arbitrators to re-consider &mdash; M in <font color="#ffcc00;">un  <font color="#ffcc00;">Spiderman &bull; Review Me 10:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, then. Alai 14:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

As I said on the other page I would recomend probation on Minun. With the provision that any future issues will result in the block. Æon Insane Ward 18:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)