Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Evidence

Apologies on the length of my response (I only noticed the word-limit request after I posted it). I've also been informed by the clerks that it is a bit wordy, but it covers my views on the concerns raised, and I don't expect to expand it any further. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 17:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Iamunknown neither of the final links you give in your evidence lead to anything relevant. Wikitruth is not wikipedia and the second leads only to the deletion log. Viridae Talk 06:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * That is your opinion. I disagree; Wikitruth is not Wikipedia, but it supplies sufficient context related to Jeffrey's desire to not have a user page; so does the deletion log.  --Iamunknown 06:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Only leads to the deletion log = not specific or at least for me. It is the site wide deletion log not the one restricted to his user page. Wikitruth is only a source for evidence in this case If I had been aware of it. Viridae Talk 09:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I do not want my user page to be an issue. While Viridae's action lead to my reaction, and I do believe its pretty self evident based on the evidence I presented that I don't want anything there and that I have had to go out of my way to accomplish that , it still does not make my choice of words appropriate. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 10:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)