Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Licorne/Proposed decision

''Users are required to participate in the give and take of Wikipedia's dispute resolution procedures in good faith, especially in the earlier steps of negotiation, consulting sources, and mediation. Where users are unwilling to participate in the dispute resolution process in good faith, measures may be taken to stop the disruptive behavior without their participation.'' is interesting. And might be useful. Do the arbitrators mean that, in future, editors felt to be disruptive, but perhaps not so obviously disruptive that they could be blocked just for that, and who refuse to participate in RFC/RFA, may be blocked? William M. Connolley 22:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

profoundly disturbing remarks
Hi, I realize that voting is well underway, and it probably doesn't make a difference anyways, but it may be worth taking this (scroll down to the bottom) into account when deciding if a one year ban is sufficient. In my opinion, there is nothing to be gained by letting neo-Nazis spread their filth on Wikipedia, ever. –Joke 15:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


 * More attacks, from one of his IPs: . Unrepentent, to say the least. --Fastfission 03:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

A bit bizarre URL in proposed decision
don't know where this came from, but it seems wrong....

under "Licorne made POV edits against consensus", one of the URLs is this one: - this is actually a revert on a Licorne PoV edit. The Licorne edit is actually a series of edits preceding that (for some time, he seemed to believe that if he made a series of edits, people wouldn't revert the whole thing). Should this URL be changed in the evidence? --Alvestrand 20:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Original research?
the cited examples of original research seem like POV-pushing to me, not OR - the quotes point to things that others have claimed before him - see relativity priority disputes. there is, however, a very clear case of NOR violation on the evidence page (the Winterberg case). --Alvestrand 05:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)