Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Lou franklin

Malthusian mentioned that Lou franklin was trying to remove the McCarty quote based on vulgarity, but that's only part of the story. He stated that the reason was to protect 12 year olds that may be visiting Wikipedia. When informed that Wikipedia wasn't censored for the sake of minors, he started to try to appeal to the editors' personal beliefs and consciences. -- Rory 0 96  03:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Possible bad-faith AfD
Here, Lou nominated Societal attitudes towards homosexuality for deletion because he didn't like how editors were reverting his edits and he felt the article was too POV. -- Rory 0 96  04:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Violation of ban
Lou franklin has violated the ban on participation in Talk:Societal attitudes towards homosexuality with this edit, made with User:66.30.208.149 (which he requested be unblocked). Cleduc 22:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Um, that was a month ago. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:46, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * By the way, if you see any violations that aren't from a month ago, you can report them at Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement. This page won't be on many watchlists. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * My mistake... I misread the month. I did Sockpuppet that account for future reference though. Cleduc 22:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Errata
"and this grossly ineffective request for arbitration"-- Fred Bauder was under the impression that Lou had initiated this RfAr. This is incorrect. The finding of fact will not be modified.

Fnord, Ashibaka tock 02:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Are you sure that's the right interpretation of Fred's comment? I took it to mean that Lou had defended himself in a grossly ineffective manner in the RFA.  Georgewilliamherbert 02:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm going on his statement, "I was under the impression, a gross error, that Lou franklin initiated the arbitration." Ashibaka tock 02:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)