Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Marcosantezana/Evidence

I will be out of town and away from computers till the mid of next week, and I will fill in all the details after that. KimvdLinde 18:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to comment that while I am aware of this case, and keeping occasional watch on it's progression, I don't feel I have anything additional to add. The totality of my involvement has already been covered by User:Kzollman, namely twice extending User:Marcosantezana's 3RR block for obvious evasion of the block. Given that that has been fully covered, I don't really have anything else to add. - TexasAndroid 16:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Editing quality
I have left the quality of his edits out of the evidence, as I feel that that is more a content aspect, or is it something that can be added to the problems? KimvdLinde 03:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * As a rule, ArbCom seldom interferes concerning content. I think the idea is that when editors follow our various policies and guidelines, they can sort out content problems among themselves - the problem comes when someone shows diregard for those guidelines and policies.  Let me note that Marcosantezena continues to push his POV in the article, ignoring any discussion on the talk page, and placing obnoxious comments in the edit summary.  He continues to be an obstacle to progress on the Natural selection article. Slrubenstein   |  Talk 18:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC)