Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia userbox wheel war/Workshop

I feel that Jimbo's desysoppings should be handled as an injunction. --Phroziac. o ºO (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 14:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Makes sense provided the case is wrapped up quickly. Some of these can take months to sort everything out and that would seem like an unjustified waiting period to me - especially as other 'wheel warriors' have not been so treated to date (or even in this very dispute). Perhaps the arbitors could concentrate on that issue separately before the other questions raised by these events. --CBD &#x260E; &#x2709; 15:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I too concur with Phroziac. I was struggling for the word "injunction" and I did not know where to put my comments as this is the first RfAr that I am closely following. I believe that Jimbo desysopped some sysops more to put an end to wheel-warring than to punish them. I hope that the arbcom, as a part of the remedy, would also establish some sort of wikiquette for admins whose actions can be construed as wheelwarring. Not all wheelwarring needs to be bad; if an admin makes a mistake, another admin can undo it, right? --Gurubrahma 12:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)