Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rktect/Proposed decision

Rktect moves
 * 1.) That the characterization of writing as being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.
 * 2.) That the submission of a contribution for a vfd as being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.
 * 3.) That the soliciitation of actions by others against a contributor on grounds of "original research" and "pseudo science" after said contribution has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack
 * 4.) That the reversion of a contribution on grounds of it being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.
 * 5.) That the repeated removal of material from Wikipedia as part of a personal attack be considered a bad faith action against the interests of Wikipedia.
 * 6.) That false statements given to justify the removal of Wikification, content and references be considered a personal attack. Rktect 16:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)