Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Vision Thing

Statement by Vassyana
I am not directly involved in the conflict, but I have reviewed the behaviour of Infinity0 and Vision Thing and given them warnings in the past. Both editors have been blocked for edit warring. Please note this. Relevant discussion can also be found here and here. Vassyana 14:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

evidence page
The evidence page includes this statement from User:Full Shunyata: "Keep in mind that Intangible is another anarcho-capitalist editor who is suspected of being a sockpuppet due to his aggressive and POV-style editing and personal vendetta against social anarchists." Are these kind of rash statements even allowed? Intangible2.0 16:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't see why not, and what he says is not completely false, you had edit-warred with User:AaronS and a few others. Might I remind you of Requests_for_arbitration/Intangible, before you get all indignant and self-righteous. -- infinity  0  22:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Full Shunyata is fine to keep that statement. FS is stating a deduction or theory that he has provided evidence for.  It is suitable to stay.  Cbrown1023    talk   01:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Of whom am I a sockpuppet of then? User:Full Shunyata should follow Suspected sock puppets policy instead of making accusations not backed by evidence. Intangible2.0 16:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please assume that the arbitrators will read both the assumptions and the evidence. I have no opinion on his assumption itself, but the fact stands that he is allowed to make it and state it on the page.  Cbrown1023    talk   19:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)