Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Mailer diablo

A note
I am a very small editor to think of such big issues. I wish him all the best. --Bhadani 18:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw a number of well considered comments by fellow-wikipedians. This gave me courage to participate in the discussion. I thank you all. --Bhadani 17:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your encouragement, and participation in the discussion. I really appreciate it! :) - Mailer Diablo 18:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I was about to support you as no one has replied to my comments. However, I found that you had withdrawn. I trust that you shall continue to hold your views that wikipedia requires good writers and editors, and each administrator should be able to write if not 1Fa at least few good articles. In the ultimate analysis, we have come here to write and build an encyclopedia, and all others issues are secondary. I think that editors who feel inhibited at the prospect of writing and adding real encyclopedic contents shall not feel inhibited at such suggestions. If they can not write, they do not have any business to be around at least with administrative tools. Wikipedia is not a social club, it is a serious business of building an encyclopedia. --Bhadani 15:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Politics have claimed many wikipedians, and they have stopped contributing. We require massive reforms in our systems to ensure and enhance the Project's credibility. --Bhadani 16:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes sure
Many of our friends came and challenged MD's point regarding the requirement of writitng 1FA and so on. I would like to share a link: kick them out of the project. SO MD, let the people shout against you, me and others, we should follow Jimmy's suggestion, and continue to build the Project. Ultimately, good editors shall remain, others will have to go away. Please assume good faith, I am talking in the larger interest of the Project. --Bhadani 19:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)