Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Writ Keeper

Statistics
Username:	Writ Keeper User groups:	abusefilter, sysop First edit:	Sep 29, 2011 15:20:25 Unique pages edited:	4,765 Average edits per page:	3.31 Live edits:	13,539 Deleted edits:	2,215 Total edits (including deleted):	15,754

Namespace Totals

Article	1538	11.36% Talk	423	3.12% User	2765	20.42% User talk	6033	44.56% Wikipedia	2238	16.53% Wikipedia talk	454	3.35% File	9	0.07% File talk	1	0.01% MediaWiki	12	0.09% MediaWiki talk	6	0.04% Template	44	0.32% Template talk	13	0.10% Category	1	0.01% Portal	2	0.01% Namespace Totals Pie Chart Month counts 2011/09	8 	2011/10	823 	2011/11	498 	2011/12	143 	2012/01	188 	2012/02	341 	2012/03	878 	2012/04	1177 	2012/05	1005 	2012/06	475 	2012/07	680 	2012/08	623 	2012/09	619 	2012/10	603 	2012/11	566 	2012/12	518 	2013/01	513 	2013/02	537 	2013/03	464 	2013/04	619 	2013/05	741 	2013/06	448 	2013/07	117 	2013/08	60 	2013/09	188 	2013/10	206 	2013/11	236 	2013/12	265

Top edited pages Article

31 - Cathreim_Thoirdhealbhaigh 13 - Adab_al-Tabib 11 - A_Rose_for_Emily 10 - Sülde_Tngri 9 - Pope_John_Paul_II_Elementary_School 8 - Treaty_of_Haddington 8 - Chonga 7 - Health_and_Morals_of_Apprentices_Act_1802 7 - Knight's_Spider_Web_Farm 6 - Joe_Lynam

Talk

23 - Boston_Marathon_bombings 18 - Blackbeard 18 - Reach_for_the_Sky 14 - Cathreim_Thoirdhealbhaigh 12 - Chesapeake_Energy 11 - Suicide_of_Kelly_Yeomans 11 - Jimi_Hendrix 11 - Biblical_cosmology 10 - Telangana_movement 9 - Princess_Estelle,_Duchess_of_Östergötland

User

1305 - Writ_Keeper/CSD_log 128 - Writ_Keeper/common.js   114 - Writ_Keeper/sandbox_archive 87 - Writ_Keeper/common.css 86 - Writ_Keeper/PROD_log 59 - Writ_Keeper 46 - Writ_Keeper/Scripts/userHistory.js   43 - Writ_Keeper/Scripts/teahouseTalkbackLink.js    37 - Writ_Keeper/Scripts 33 - Writ_Keeper/Scripts/autoCloser.js

User talk

818 - Writ_Keeper 371 - Drmies 85 - Dennis_Brown 48 - Worm_That_Turned 42 - Bishonen 42 - Yunshui 37 - Jimbo_Wales 35 - Jtmorgan 29 - Floquenbeam 26 - Sitush

Wikipedia

508 - Teahouse/Questions 366 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents 139 - Village_pump_(technical) 137 - Administrators'_noticeboard 132 - Usernames_for_administrator_attention 98 - Third_opinion 82 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism 67 - Sandbox 44 - Village_pump_(proposals) 32 - Requests_for_bureaucratship/Writ_Keeper

Wikipedia talk

130 - Teahouse/Host_lounge 118 - Teahouse 40 - Notifications 27 - Third_opinion 23 - Page_Curation 18 - Criteria_for_speedy_deletion 15 - Teahouse/Host_lounge/User_scripts 8 - Twinkle 7 - WikiProject_user_warnings/Testing 7 - Special:PrefixIndex

File

2 - Cthulhufish.png 2 - CdeB4.jpg 2 - William_Hussey's_business_card.PNG 1 - Dissident_Prophet's_We're_Not_Grasshoppers,_1995.j... 1 - Bank_of_Ireland,_College_Green,_Dublin_(2004).jpg 1 - Hhcrippen.jpg

File talk

1 - 041272_RWH_snow.jpg

MediaWiki

5 - Gadget-teahouse/content.js   3 - Titleblacklist 1 - Gadget-teahouse.css 1 - Titlewhitelist 1 - Gadget-mySandbox 1 - Geonotice.js

MediaWiki talk

3 - Titleblacklist 2 - Gadget-teahouse/content.js   1 - Titlewhitelist

Template

6 - Did_you_know_nominations/Cathreim_Thoirdhealbhaigh 5 - Did_you_know_nominations/Health_and_Morals_of_Appr... 5 - Did_you_know_nominations/Adab_al-Tabib 3 - Infobox_university_golf_team 2 - Editnotices/Page/Elk 2 - +1   2 - Infobox_lacrosse_player 1 - Editnotices/Page/Breast_cancer_awareness 1 - TH_question_page 1 - Did_you_know_nominations/Herringbone_(horse)

Template talk

9 - Holden_Special_Vehicles 2 - Did_you_know 1 - Test 1 - Archive_top

Category

1 - Titus_Andronicus_albums

Portal

1 - Fish/Intro 1 - History/Featured_article/14

Let's not
I really don't think it's a good idea to hat other peoples' questions. WK is a big boy, he can answer or not answer things himself. Hatting other peoples' questions is a way to stir up more drama, which is the opposite of the hatting rationale. I have a hard time understanding why people get worked up about one oppose when this is, so far, at 75-1-3. I don't think WK needs people defending him. Just let Jusdafax have his say. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Especially when the hatter, admin TParis, is a supporter of the candidate, which is an outright vio of WP:INVOLVED. Indeed, he also interjected himself in my oppose to a remarkable degree, so much so that I felt the questions were the only way I could get information on the candidates views without interference. Is this to be tolerated as acceptable? I request in all fairness that my questions be restored at once. Jus  da  fax   21:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Which part of involved includes not using the tools, again? Please don't shotgun-link silly policies that have nothing to do with the situation.  Now if I blocked you for badgering and disruptive editing, you might have a case.  @Floq, only because you've asked, I'll revert myself.  The question is likely to be ignored anyway.--v/r - TP 21:33, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * HAtting is not the answer. If anything, watching the candidate keep his cool throughout this alleged discussion 'as only affirmed my confidence. My policy is that if i don't like something on the internet, it's my problem and i should just not click that link. time to unwatch this nowhere discussion. y'all givin' me a headache. Dloh cierekim  23:34, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks all!
Hey, I'm still not a big fan of thankspam, so let me just say here: thanks to everyone who participated! I'll take your suggestions and concerns in consideration. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 20:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)