Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bason0


 * yeah, those are my other ID. but, i do not act like 2 people. also, i did not discussion like other people. or protect my second ID i do not violation any rule. do you understand Sock puppetry mean?
 * to admin. i report to this guy to 3rr violation.


 * Three-revert rule violation on many page. i already warn his talk page.: Time reported: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Watermint


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * he did not obey alphabetical order. dokdo's "d" is ahead of takeshima's "t". and this island governed by korea gov. also, korean people residence there. no japanese in that island. this island contolled by korea gov. japan is just "claim".
 * in japan, they can't go to dokdo by ship and airplane. (they need permit by korea gov.) but korea can. i already metioned this to article's discussion page.
 * 
 * so, his change is clearly out of neutral point of view. i already warn him.
 * also, he insert false information at.
 * he did not obey alphabetical order, and that image is not fishline.
 * Please see Liancourt Rocks, 2005 in Japan, Korea, Usan-do. and many edit of his korea relation edit. This user Watermint has engaged in seriously edit war.Bason1 12:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Known sockpuppet of Bason0

 * Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bason0
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bason0
 * Suspected sock puppets/Bason0
 * Requests for IP check - Bason0 and anons at 11:58, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Other related sockpuppets

 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Replayamong31

March 2008

 * Commnet: I did not know Matsuoka is already block. However, Endroit, if you wish to request for checkuser on Bason0, don't take advantage of my report. I need you to clean up and move your stuff here to somewhere relevant. And among your mixed request, the locations are diverse. Are you fishing?--Appletrees (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: There's no need for checkuser, since is already indef blocked by Future Perfect at Sunrise.
 * However, if is to be checked, I have a separate set of disruptive users who haven't been blocked yet.  The following users made disruptive edits in the Sea of Japan article, similar to Bason0:--Endroit (talk) 03:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (already indef blocked)
 * (most recently confirmed as Bason0 sock, already blocked)
 * Some of these were coordinated attacks, working together with socks below:
 * (already blocked)
 * (already blocked)
 * (already blocked)
 * Submitted by: Endroit (talk) 04:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Some of these were coordinated attacks, working together with socks below:
 * (already blocked)
 * (already blocked)
 * (already blocked)
 * Submitted by: Endroit (talk) 04:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Some of these were coordinated attacks, working together with socks below:
 * (already blocked)
 * (already blocked)
 * (already blocked)
 * Submitted by: Endroit (talk) 04:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (already blocked)
 * Submitted by: Endroit (talk) 04:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You can't just throw a bunch of names on an unrelated check, and many of these accounts are too stale to check. If you have current concerns, add them to the appropriate prior case (AirFrance358 or General Tojo, I suppose) and relist it, or create a new request with evidence of disruptive behavior validating a check. Thatcher 13:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I have relisted it partially under Requests for checkuser/Case/AirFrance358.
 * Please note that AirFrance358 and Bason0  are both suspected of using Korea Telecom.--Endroit (talk) 17:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: Bason0 socks are getting more sophisticated, and are likely to be using multiple personalities.  For example, back in August, an Autoblock on a Bason0 sock appears to have tripped up  (now ).  Then a new personality pops up and edits as, trying to attack admins on behalf of Mumun man.... except in one edit, the "new personality" mistakenly edited under Mumun man (Flamebroil):
 * Diff : 22:51, 16 August 2007 by, from User talk:Korea history
 * Diff : 22:54, 16 August 2007 by, from User talk:Kprideboi
 * Diff : 22:57, 16 August 2007 by, from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea
 * --Endroit (talk) 20:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Endroit, you are surely doing fishing which is desruptive. You know that Mumun man, a very good contributor is living in Canada and uses fair English unlike socks of Bason0. What is wrong with you? Dont exploit my file here. --Appletrees (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree that was a good editor most of the time.  But my diffs above show undeniable proof that Mumun man used  as a sock.  Besides Mumun man being tripped up by a Bason0-related Autoblock, this edit by Sword of Ara Gaya removed a Bason0  tag.  This action was never explained by either user, despite this inquiry by Alison.  Oh, and AirFrance358 used IP addresses from Ontario, Canada too.--Endroit (talk) 15:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. If I had known that Matsuoka has already blocked by Fut.Perf, I would not have submitted this file. In your theory, if anyone removing a sock or unfair tag before you or your friends submit a RFCU file on them, they have to be directly accused of the sockpuppeter? If so,, and you who frequently removed "sock" tags from previously accused your friends are "definitely" socks of or . You also did the same mistake on me. I don't know Mumun man well, but followed your links, the checkuser Alison let Mumun man go because he did not seem to be "disruptive" with whatever his socks. In addition, you said Bason0 is using Kornet, one of the three gigantic ISPs in South Korea, and are you saying Bason0 currently living in Canada and jumping from there to Korea? Do you have any proof for the claim that Bason0 lives in Canada? Toronto is a big city, and if I follow your theory, every editors residing in Tokyo are the same sockpuppeter? You just mix every people involved in Sea of Japan (East Sea) who disagree with your edit and I don't think "the content dispute" should be blamed for "disruption". What you are doing here is more than disruptions because you're using other person's filing. You should provide what disruptive edits Mumun man may have. I'm very certain that Mumun man has nothing to do with Bason0 and any disruptive edits. Your irrelevant comment and my response will be moved anyway.--Appletrees (talk) 02:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)