Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dyslexic agnostic

Comments
T-Man is a complete obsessive case. I fix his edits because his English grammar and spelling is atrocious; see the above or most any edit of his for proof of this. His fantasies and delusions of sock puppets further proves his obsessions. Instead of editing wikipedia, he chooses to infatuate over me, and defame me. My edit history and dedication to useful edits speaks for itself. It was he that started editing in comics-related pages long after me, but claims I followed him there... let the edit histories speak for themselves. T-Man is under mentor supervision, and his mentors should be consulted by anyone looking into this "checkuser" idea. I sincerely wish he would leave me alone, and be thankful that someone is cleaning up his poor grammar and spelling. -- Dyslexic agnostic 18:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Clarifications: I asked for my mentors and D.A. is also under observation and has been told to let someone else to do the "clean-up" after me. But let's not distract the attention the issue is werther or not Gillespee is a sock. The HISTORY of his talk page seems to confirm so.--T-man, the wise 21:52, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

How does that "history" show that Gillespie is my sockpuppet? What a joke. Just because two editors both clean-up after T-man, we must be sockpuppets. Logical! Please... how long do I have to get slandered before someone does something about it? -- Dyslexic agnostic 23:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * A=Good question. That's his (your other, if it can be proved) talk page history. During its entire existence has only been significantly modified by both of us. Bennon and the other user commented about pages in common with us and our edits. And please, keep the tone down, and focus (if you really need to comment) on proving you're not a sockpuppeteer, as per the clerk's comment.--T-man, the wise 04:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I know that. I never said you created the sockuser to torture me. But to have a user supopporting your deletionism. You delete first, ask later with both accounts. And support each accounts comments. A sock isn't necesarely obvious. Actually if I had one I'd be as careful or even more. --T-man, the wise 04:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I admit it... T-Man is actually a sock puppet of me, DA. I have a dual personality in constant conflict with each other, which I externalize on wikipedia.
 * See, the above makes just as much sense as what T-Man just said... am I in some weird parallel dimension where this is supposed to be logical???? Gillespie just proved there is no sock puppet... unless Gillespie is really T-Man's puppet? HELP!!! -- Dyslexic agnostic 04:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)