Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Halaqah

comments moved from main page. --ST47 Talk 16:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Is this how you deal with your problems?--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ 16:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Halaqah

 * I guess all who agree are sock-puppets, i must be many people because many editors on both sub Africa and Slavery in modern Africa agree with my edits against a know POV agent. and again on Slavery in Modern Africa. Let the readers be aware that Strothra has stalked me for years on this site and blindly reverts my content. I can bring much evidence of that.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ 16:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It appears that the RastaRule username was used (at least) to evade Halaqah's most recent block. Halaqah has not been re-blocked, not has the sockpuppet been blocked.Proabivouac 01:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * When I'm acting as checkuser, I far prefer someone else to act on the results. In fact, it kinda says that right near the top of the page. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 03:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That makes total sense, except that these hypothetical administrators who will dutifully act upon these findings appear not to actually exist. See this as proof of the ineffectuality of our hand-wringing proceduralism.Proabivouac 07:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Remind me not to do anything for you in the future. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 13:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yikes, I'd rather not…ideally it would work as you suggest (well, ideally they'd be have been blocked already by the duck test.) It's not your lapse if no one follows up, just a fact that no one did in time to prevent more disruption. I am sorry for having offended you.Proabivouac 20:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Annoyed. Not offended. No damage done. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 00:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)