Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mrinal Pandey

Due to a ban appeal, the blocks on three of these users has been lifted by the WP:BASC. If other banned users wish to appear their blocks, administrators are welcome to review them on a case by case basis, or direct the person to the ban appeal subcommittee. John Vandenberg (chat) 05:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * (That was >5 years ago.) It looks like they've weren't explicitly re-banned, by ArbCom, as part of the case below. (Not sure.) I can find no clue as to why you / BASC unbanned . (That ONE makes sense; was on the basis of one questionable edit, that was adequately explained in a reply) and, John Vandenberg.  Secret?! (edit: yup. "Deliberations of the subcommittee are not public.")  Can someone please re-ban them, so it's clear that if they come back, they're breaking a rule?  I've been bold and made what I think are appropriate user page edits.  Courcelles blocked Wifione with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Banned per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Wifio; I think the same is appropriate for these three two. --Elvey(t•c) 18:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Elvey, the current arbcom, or their clerks or checkusers, should re-ban any accounts as required. I am none of the above at the moment.  The only private information I have about those users is many years old, and probably quite stale due to more recent checkuser and arbcom investigations. John Vandenberg (chat) 03:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Wifione
ARBCOM deemed administrator User:Wifione was a probable sock of this user/army too. (official ruling). The page should probably say so, no?--Elvey(t•c) 17:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)