Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nat.tang

comments moved from main page: ST47 01:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not really related with this case but I have a comment. Nat.tang is currently active and not banned or blocked, not in any edit war. So why would he need a sock?--Jerry 00:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * He needed a sock so that he could vandalize someone's talk page without being reprimanded or banned. It's quite obvious. Jerry openly sides with Nat.tang, so I am not surprised with this comment.Heqong 00:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What? Nat is Pan-Blue, and I'm Pan-Green, why would I side with him?--Jerry 00:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Stop trying to bring politics into this. Politics has nothing to do with this Check User request. I do not think Nat.tang is Pan-Blue. Thank you for admitting that you are Pan-Green. Now we can see your POV in editing articles-eliminating Republic of China or China and bolding Taiwan...I see your true motives. Heqong 01:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * In ideology, you can consider me as Pan-Blue as I am a member of a political party that has close ties to the KMT. I have no need for a SOCK, as I like to do something with a cover of an IP address and I have no need or motive to vandalize your userpage, Heqong. However the warnings issued without substance, by adding even more, and removing something I clearly added on my talk page, is clearly vandalism and clearly harassment, so i suggest that you stop right now. Nat Tang talk to me! 01:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Stop trying to twist things around falsely in your favor. Face it. You were wrong to attack and vandalize my user page. That was a disturbing action that you did. It was even more disturbing to you to continually hurt me/attack me. The comment you left on your own talk page for me is evidence of that. You also use caps for that and for when you vandalized my talk page using that IP address account. This further ties you into having sock puppeteer. What political party are you referring to? There is no Canadian party that has ties with any in the ROC. Heqong 02:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think you have ever heard of International Democrat Union. and I did not vandalize your userpage and you really sound like a banned user I know. Your scare tactics do not work on me. Nat Tang talk to me! 02:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

I do not really care about your political views. They don't mean anything here or on Wikipedia. This has nothing to do with your political views. Rather, you have engaged in sock puppeting and vandalism. That is completely inappropriate and inconsiderate of you. In the last comment you made, you are again not assuming good faith. This is not the first time. The IDU is not a political party but a conglomerate of parties. I am Heqong only. I am not anyone else. I have been on Wikipedia for quite a while now. Heqong 04:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Another thing, Heqong, only has two edits in its history. The first one the dates back to 23:05, 21 May 2007 (EDT) and was an edit on Formula SAE, which firstly I'm not into and secondly I have no clue what it is. The second and most recent was dated 19:29, 13 June 2007 (EDT) and was a message left on your talk page and it was clearly not vandalism. That was confirmed by Jerry. Other things I dug into was your history. You had perviously been blocked by the ArbCom (Case Opened on 20:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)/Case Closed on 14:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)) for disruptive edits, personal attacks, and the fact that you view other people's edits, especially when they don't agree with you, as vandalism. In my opinion, listing Jerry and myself as vandals on your userpage is a form of personal attack, accusing others without substance and a valid reason is a form of personal attack, disregarding other people's edits and then saying that their ideas are stupid, or invaild, is a form of personal attack, Picking a fight with an editor and claim that they're a novice or an attacker with no substance is a form of personal attack...do you want me to continue? because I can go on and on. As they say where I come from: "Les Jeux Sont Fait", which translates to "the game is finished" or in this situation, you scheme to blacken my username has failed, Heqong. Give it up. Nat Tang talk to me! 04:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What on earth are you talking about? That was a big rant you made above me. Let me tell you this. The past is the past. I don't live in the past, and I know you don't too. Because this is the present and soon to be future. I have decided to rejoin the Wikipedia community after my absence. I am a changed person, but will not let others bully me around. That is completely wrong. I am being bullied around by Nat.tang in this particular instance. I have never even interacted with this person. The former people that I had interacted before my absence have not even talked to me yet since my return. Instead, I have been attacked from all sides from unidentified users. This alarms me very much. Sock puppeteers as well as vandals. What has Wikipedia come to? But don't worry, I will stay. Heqong 04:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Heqong, really all I have to say is : Checkmate. Nat Tang talk to me! 00:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)