Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/TerryJ-Ho


 * No I did not say you to be a paid agent of Shiv Sena..but the last two "Fascists", and "Right wing Hindutva elements" yes..I did..and this cannot be taken as an offence by you - "Right wing Hindutva elements" as your dear friend Neta has himself boasted that most Indian Hindus are right wing and almost all Hindus outside India are right wing and supportive of Hindutva too.TerryJ-Ho 17:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Who are you responding to? Blnguyen made this and I assisted on the bottom.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

He then mysteriously disappeared, with no edits for a while now. Almost immediately, came a "neophyte" user User:Geek1975.

For a new user, he was surprisingly quick and correct with his edits to the exact same article of the exact same nature. When confronted, he denied that he was somebody's sockpuppet and said that he was a "fast learner" here. Now, I dunno abt you fine folks but I'm a pretty fast learner myself, and it took me a long tiem to get the hangof wikipedia enough to do such deft editing.


 * Commendable effort from Geek as a new user.Once the check is complete may I know from which country is he editing from?

Edits of Terryj-ho here here

Edits of Geek1975 summary

here he adds info that was added (and then later removed by consensus) in the 2002 Gujarat violence article.

here he does the same, moving information to another article, the same thing that TerryJ-Ho had done as User:Lkadvani. here he argues the veracity of a source in the same vein that Lkadvani/TerryJ-Ho had.

There is further evidence if you study the contrib histories of both users. All these circumstances together point to the distinct possibility that Geek1975 is a sockpuppet of TerryJ-Ho, made so in order to gain a false consensus and possibly find a way around 3rr rules..


 * Geek1975 made a case that I was a sockpuppet and TerryJho backed him up there (in response to my warning NPA templete) . Of course the report was a load of garbage but there are even more examples of these two socks conniving.
 * Note: I checked this page mentioned above and I don't see any edits or support provided to Geek.My name does not exist in the edit history of this page.Can I ask punitive action against the user for suspecting my good faith and wasting community's time on false accusations TerryJ-Ho 00:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Really, then Blnguyen (creator) would be liable, not me.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

To reiterate the accusations, almost all of geek's major edits have come from three pages: 2002 Gujarat violence/2006 revision, Godhra Train Burning, and Godhra. The rest have been talk page edits, including vandalism of my user page, , , and. Its almost like he's doing TerryJho (aka Lkadvani aka Geek 1975's) dirty work.Bakaman Bakatalk 22:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Also in edit counts (essjay tool) I see that Lkaadvani had 175, TerryJ-Ho had 171, and Geek1975 has 91. Geek therefore falls under the 100 edit mark for a sock.Bakaman Bakatalk 02:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:


 * Welcome to the new user - I have life outside of Wikipedia too..Its no 24 7/7 job TerryJ-Ho 17:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)