Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Unprovoked

Copied from project page
If the case was as weak as you claim, the CUs never would have accepted it and run the check. TT admitted to being someone else with this edit on his talk page "WP knows. The Tutor (talk) 13:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)", and oh by the way you actually harmed him more by stating it's his real name here. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello. I don't know if it's his real name. He denies it, and I believe him. Good enough? &mdash;Whig (talk) 23:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Presumably the reason the CUs accepted this case is that you suggested he might be a puppet of Unprovoked. We know that Unprovoked is a sock master, so they checked it out. There was no proven connection between MC and TT. You should be ashamed. &mdash;Whig (talk) 00:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)