Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Watchdogb

I would suggest who ever is handling this checkrequest read this from lahiru's attempted accusation. Sinhala freedom 19:06, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * User lahiru_k seems to want to 'spin' the illusion that I have been very active at wp:ani and wp:ani/3rr.  This is absolute nonsense.  I made one complaint on wp:ani regarding user lahiru_k's and snowolfd4's repeated harassment and trolling of me and I  was involved in a discussion relating to one 3rr complaint.  Sinhala freedom 20:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Wait, wait wait. I don't get it... Just because two editors revert/edit some POV pushed by [unnamed] user and friends it makes me a sock of someone else ? [Here] There is another editor who also feels that the tags needs to be added to the article. Note that Lahiru_K and Snowolfd4 were also in this edit 'war'. According to Lahiru_k's logic he seems to imply that he is a sock of Snowolfd4 because he also participates in a edit war.


 * Note :
 * MY Contrib : 22:45, 24 July 2007 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/3RR (New report on 3rr violation)


 * MY Contibs: 22:46, 24 July 2007 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR (→User:Snowolfd4 reported by User:watchdogb (result))


 * Sinhala Freedom's contrib: 22:46, 24 July 2007 (hist) (diff) Talk:Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (→Regarding the proposed section about external support)


 * Seems like I can be at 2 different places at same time. Or mabe I can travel closer to the speed of sound and get from one spot to another (more than 10-15 km away) and contribute less than a minut later.


 * "which is unusual behavior for a legitimate editor"? So you are saying that there is no other account in wikipedia that do just that ? I have even seen acount that just add's smiles to people's take page. Anyway, I'll let Checkuser do their job :) Watchdogb 14:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Personaly I feel this is WP:Harassment of User:Watchdogb without giving time for due process for an admin to close the case of suspected sock puppets, this has been brought forward. Further this is not the first time User:Watchdogb has been tagged wrongly as a sock puppet all by those who do not agree with his edist. Thanks Taprobanus 17:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


 * While there is more evidence here than at the SSP case, two revert wars on related topics do not a sockpuppet make. The evidence does seem to indicate that Sinhala isn't editing entirely in good faith, but that doesn't mean that he even has a sockpuppet, much less that Watchdogb is the sock. -Amarkov moo! 18:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, and the email mentioned says nothing about him being a sockpuppet, even if we assumed that he were stupid enough to admit sockpuppetry that he's trying to hide. -Amarkov moo! 18:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)