Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Antidote

IP Address Accounts
Fair Warning- This is my first post in Wikiepdia under this user name. For Questions regarding the user name, please visit my name's page. The only interest that I have in the RfC is that proceeding is fair and complete information is provided.

I've reviewed the chart showing the alleged interaction between these screen names, included in which were IP addresses. But I haven't seen a recording for the information on the IP addresses themselves. What follows are the Network Solutions listings from their IP address. OnceBitten 20:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

72.144.136.169
 * OrgName:   BellSouth.net Inc.
 * OrgID:     BELL
 * Address:   575 Morosgo Drive
 * Atlanta
 * StateProv: GA
 * PostalCode: 30324
 * Country:   US


 * ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.eng.bellsouth.net:4321


 * NetRange:  72.144.0.0 - 72.159.255.255
 * CIDR:      72.144.0.0/12
 * NetName:   BELLSNET-BLK15
 * NetHandle: NET-72-144-0-0-1
 * Parent:    NET-72-0-0-0-0
 * NetType:   Direct Allocation
 * NameServer: NS.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * NameServer: NS.ATL.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * NameServer: NS.MIA.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * NameServer: NS.RDU.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * Comment:
 * Comment:   For Abuse Issues, email abuse@bellsouth.net. NO ATTACHMENTS. Include IP
 * Comment:   address, time/date, message header, and attack logs.
 * Comment:   For Subpoena Request, email ipoperations@bellsouth.net with "SUBPOENA" in
 * Comment:   the subject line. Law Enforcement Agencies ONLY, please.
 * RegDate:   2005-08-11
 * Updated:   2005-11-11

70.146.15.207


 * OrgName:   BellSouth.net Inc.
 * OrgID:     BELL
 * Address:   575 Morosgo Drive
 * City:      Atlanta
 * StateProv: GA
 * PostalCode: 30324
 * Country:   US


 * ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.eng.bellsouth.net:4321


 * NetRange:  70.144.0.0 - 70.159.255.255
 * CIDR:      70.144.0.0/12
 * NetName:   BELLSNET-BLK15
 * NetHandle: NET-70-144-0-0-1
 * NET-70-0-0-0-0
 * NetType:   Direct Allocation
 * NameServer: NS.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * NameServer: NS.ATL.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * NameServer: NS.MIA.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * NameServer: NS.RDU.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * Comment:
 * Comment:   For Abuse Issues, email abuse@bellsouth.net. NO ATTACHMENTS. Include IP
 * Comment:   address, time/date, message header, and attack logs.
 * Comment:   For Subpoena Request, email ipoperations@bellsouth.net with "SUBPOENA" in
 * Comment:   the subject line. Law Enforcement Agencies ONLY, please.
 * RegDate:   2004-07-28
 * Updated:   2005-08-11

65.10.56.72


 * OrgName:   BellSouth.net Inc.
 * OrgID:     BELL
 * Address:   575 Morosgo Drive
 * City:      Atlanta
 * StateProv: GA
 * PostalCode: 30324
 * Country:   US


 * ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.eng.bellsouth.net:4321


 * NetRange:  65.0.0.0 - 65.15.255.255
 * CIDR:      65.0.0.0/12
 * NetName:   BELLSNET-BLK15
 * NetHandle: NET-65-0-0-0-1
 * Parent:    NET-65-0-0-0-0
 * NetType:   Direct Allocation
 * NameServer: NS.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * NameServer: NS.ATL.BELLSOUTH.NET
 * Comment:
 * Comment:   For Abuse Issues, email abuse@bellsouth.net. NO ATTACHMENTS. Include IP
 * Comment:   address, time/date, message header, and attack logs.
 * Comment:   For Subpoena Request, email ipoperations@bellsouth.net with "SUBPOENA" in
 * Comment:   the subject line. Law Enforcement Agencies ONLY, please.
 * RegDate:   2003-12-29
 * Updated:   2004-07-28

68.223.196.243
 * Record Type:  IP Address
 * OrgName:   BellSouth.net Inc.
 * OrgID:     BELL
 * Address:   575 Morosgo Drive
 * City:      Atlanta
 * StateProv: GA
 * PostalCode: 30324
 * Country:   US


 * ReferralServer: rwhois://rwhois.eng.bellsouth.net:4321


 * NetRange:  68.208.0.0 - 68.223.255.255

Note
It seems like maybe the subject of the RfC and the Nominator are a little confused by the goal of RfC. The purpose of RfC is to reach an agreement on the dispute. Not just to fire accusations back and forth, but to work towards some kind of consensus about what to do. The nominator has raised some issues about the subject's conduct, but all I have seen take place is "You did it!" and "No I didn't!" and nothing that looks anything like moving towards resolving the dispute.

Nothing "bad" can or should really ever come out of an RfC. Peyna 14:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Penya- Yours is a reasonable approach.  Perhaps you should share you opinion on the general RfC talk page. OnceBitten 22:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC)