Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee/Summary

Ambiguity
What does "No individual, or plurality of Arbitrators should make announcements or declarations on behalf of the entire committee, they are to only be made by the plurality or the individual making them" mean? Do you mean "they are only to be made on behalf of the plurality or the individual making them"? (And it should be a semi-colon after "committee".) Sam Korn (smoddy) 11:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * As it's written. Announcements should only be made by the individuals or pluralities (in the case of joint statements) making them. --Barberio (talk) 21:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You say "as it's written", but I don't understand it. Perhaps I am being particularly obtuse, but your sentence seems a truism:  "Statements should only be made by people making statements."  You trying to say that no individual should purport to speak for the AC where that is inaccurate.  It's currently really unclear, and the fact that you understand it does not mean that I do.  Can you give an example of what you mean?  Sam Korn (smoddy) 15:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Written a clarified version. Hope that helps. --Barberio (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It does help, yes. I'm not sure how far I agree with it, but it's certainly clear!  Sam Korn (smoddy) 17:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Committee expansion and elections
I've started a thread at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008 looking to enact or at least move towards creating a larger committee. There's some issues over what this will mean in practise. Thoughts welcome. Hiding T 15:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)