Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Bishonen 3

Closure recommendation
In my view, this RfC is sound and fury, signifying nothing, and should never have been opened. As I'm not an RfC/user regular, what are the procedures for getting a disruptive RfC like this one closed? Unit Anode  20:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't know we had an article on that soliloquy! Neither of us can close this, as we've both particiapated. You can create a section called "move to close" instead of "View by Unitanode" and place your statement there. It may or may not lead to early closure. KillerChihuahua ?!?Advice 20:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I can certainly see why some people would like this closed. However I still want to know why an administrator on Wikipedia knowingly allowed another administrator to use a sock puppet to support her point of view in a dispute. Surely this is a violation of trust. I don't think it is unreasonable to want this behavior examined by the community. Chillum  03:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that your views regarding -- and antagonism towards -- Bishonen are explained quite well in your posted view. Unit  Anode  04:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I am not sure what you are talking about Unitanode. I think it is a bit inappropriate to discard the facts due to who says them anyways. It is not as though there is a lack of evidence, though you folks have done a fine job sweeping it under the rug. Chillum  12:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You are, of course, free to have that view of the issue. It's not true, but you are free to believe whatever you like about me. Unit  Anode  13:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)