Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/BlueRobe 2

Comments on ... the view by User:Marknutley
Anyone else notice that Marknutley again misrepresents the contents of my post, in that first diff he listed in his view? I find it troubling that Mark nutley demonizes an intention to "enforce the established consensus". BigK HeX (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Please explain how it is misrepresented? And it is not your place to enforce anything, the fact that you seem to think you can only shows more battleground mentality mark nutley (talk) 13:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You said I was going to revert any edits "I didn't like". Quote that part of my post here for us, please.  Thanks! BigK HeX (talk) 13:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * My agenda will to WP:BeBold in ruthlessly reverting any edits that defy any points of consensus established on this talk page, whether any members of the vocal minority respect that consensus or not. Looks to me like you saying you will revert anything you don`t like the look of, a part of your selfimposed enforcement duties perhaps? mark nutley (talk) 13:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Such logic may explain those ArbCom sanctions regarding misuse of sources... BigK HeX (talk) 13:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Erm? I have no sanctions from arbcom, do you have a crystal ball? Are you saying i`m wrong? That consensus can`t change? That if i or any other editor add or remove content from the article which you think is against your idea of what the consensus is then you will ruthlessly revert them, what is that other than, wp:idontlikeit so it ain`t going in. Sorry mate but you said it, you obviously meant it, and it is as plain as the nose on your face what exactly you meant by it mark nutley (talk) 13:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, from an interpretive perspective surely if consensus changes BigKHex would ruthlessly revert content that is not in line with the new consensus? --Errant[tmorton166] $(chat!)$ 14:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Bigk hex, i dunno were you think that diff goes, but it ain`t to arbcom mate :) Errant could you clarify that statement please? mark nutley (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Uh well I mean BKH was explicit in saying he would reverse changes not in line with consensus on the talk page - surely if consensus changes so would what he reverts :) --Errant[tmorton166] $(chat!)$ 14:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * General_sanctions/Climate_change_probation/Requests_for_enforcement/Archive9. In any case, your reading of sources hasn't exactly been flawless. And here, you're blatantly misrepresenting my post.  BigK HeX (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I do not believe i am misrepresenting anything, your failure to AGF on how i view your post shows yet more battlefield behaviour and is not helping anything here at all, why not clarify what you meant instead of attacking me? mark nutley (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I also believe you are misrepresenting several things. I read BigK Hex's comment as saying he will support whatever the current consensus is, and that he will revert changes which have not achieve consensus. That's also my experience of what BigK Hex does, as when he and I first met we had a run in on another article. At first he reverted my changes, but after discussion had achieved a new consensus, he left well enough alone. Second, you refer to my "gem" as taunting BlueRobe... but the comment you link was made to Darkstar1st, who had just reverted his non-consensus change back into the article about seven times. As the comment was not made to BlueRobe, nor was BlueRobe even around at the time, your comment about my comment being made to taunt him is complete and utter bullshit. Yworo (talk) 20:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That is your belief and you are entitled to it, please redact your personal attack in calling my statements bullshit, thanks mark nutley (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I know the comment was made to DS btw, i believe blues response was a direct result of that comment so no, the diffs and what i wrote are correct mark nutley (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, so something I said to another user made BlueRobe engage in a personal attack? Somebody needs to watch Anger Management. Yworo (talk) 20:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem surprised that your apparent gloating at another editor being blocked could rasie tensions and anger people? mark nutley (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You really need to apply WP:AGF. I wasn't gloating. I was sincerely wishing that the editor enjoy their enforced Wikibreak, as they clearly needed one. Yworo (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Can I endorse the thrust of Yworo's comment here (if not necessarily the exact tone)? :o)  Indeed, Yworo and I have worked on building consensus before.  And here, neither of us seems to have any vested interest in this Libertarianism material itself, as opposed to an interest in moderating the unproductive editorial atmosphere and blatant disregard for policy that seems prevalent at the moment. BigK HeX (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Editor retired
I notice that User:Marknutley has "retired", so I assume he will not be participating further. (See User talk:Marknutley.) TFD (talk) 02:37, 1 October 2010 (UTC)