Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/CoolKatt number 99999

See also: Requests for comment/Rollosmokes (discussion)

This is not necessary
Look, most of this dispute is your own doing. You can't blame me because I want to dream. Let's end this now please. CoolKatt number 99999 20:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Another case
I have been labelled a vandal by CoolKatt number 99999 for going with consensus with regards to TV market station listing templates and not including out-of-market stations. Kirjtc2 19:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * myself and another bunch of users were labelled sock puppets for agreeing with an AFD. While CFIF may have gone overboard in his own conduct, it does NOT excuse CKs behaviour outside of this incident. There are many incidents of personal attacks made by this user. --Crossmr 16:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

More Comments
In my opinion, this whole mess is getting to be very annoying. Both of the users involved in this dispute are violating WP:3RR and WP:NOT, over and over again. WP:TVS has yet to reach a consensus on the main issue involved here (out of market stations), yet these users are fighting the issue out via an edit war. Wait for a resolution, then we will fix the relevant pages. AlexDW 17:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Another statement from CoolKatt
His justification here that his speculation is factual simply because it "makes sense" is, to be civil, not in the best interests of Wikipedia. Lambertman 22:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)