Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Expansion of Ban Appeals Subcommittee

Requesting a site notice
This is an important RfC with significant implications affecting the entire community. It is intuitively prudent that a site notice be appended to legitimize the end product and promote transparency, IMO. My76Strat (talk) 11:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * A watchlist notice? Yeah, I think that's a good idea. Whatever your opinion on this is, it remains an important discussion. Just as long as the notice doesn't say this is an Arbitration Committee-approved RfC (as it isn't), just one relating to their work. Lord Roem (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Update: I have posted a link to this RfC on the 'Centralized Discussion' template. Hopefully that will draw more attention and input to these proposals. Lord Roem (talk) 19:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for updating this thread; more so for demonstrating pro-active measures to support its validity. My76Strat (talk) 20:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)