Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Hephaestos

Deleted text from a sock puppet, who is obviously Lir:
 * I have forwared the following comments to the FBI for investigation of criminal assault through use of interstate communication. Before you call the allegation silly, I suggest you read the federal statutes regarding assault

RickK 04:27, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Matter of Hephaestos

 * I don't see why Jimbo referred Hephaestos to arbitration in the first place. As no one has brought up any problems with Hephaestos here, I propose this is removed from the Requests for arbitration page as no one appears to be requesting it. Angela. 23:44, Feb 23, 2004 (UTC)
 * I agree with Angela's argument and reasoning. Metasquares 03:39, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I second this motion. -- Viajero 11:44, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Arbitrator opinions on accepting the matter of Hephaestos
''Note: if four arbitrators have not voted to accept the case by 16:57, Feb 26, 2004, UTC, this case will be rejected.


 * I vote we do not accept Matter of Hephaestos as no serious infraction of Wikipedia rules is alleged. He was simply contemplated as the plaintiff as in Hepaestos versus Wik which is being dealt with as Matter of Wik. Fred Bauder 13:29, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)


 * There is Requests for comment/Hephaestos, but the issues addressed there do not appear to constitute a pattern of behavior, IMO, and were made during a perceived power vacuum. I do not accept hearing this case. --mav 08:15, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * Concurred. -- James F. (talk) 11:30, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * I vote to decline to hear the Heph case. --the Epopt 14:36, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * It seems there's nothing for us to hear, so I guess there's little point hearing it. --Camembert