Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Indians in Afghanistan

Intimation to WikiProjects
I have intimated the concerned WikiProjects about the existence of this RFC - India & Afghanistan. AshLin (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I've also informed WP:PAK and WP:NPOVN to gather comments from related users as these would be relevant noticeboards. -- lTopGunl (talk) 09:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Should the article mention that 'India has no military presence in Afghanistan'?
I presume as TG has withdrawn his complaint about this we now have a consensus for it's inclusion. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I did not with draw it... I commented on mediator's talk page for the unreliable references (and they've been through RSN as well). He closed it on those basis. I've not checked out the references that were provided after I told him of the verification and he closed it meanwhile. I've left him a note to review it. This was not done in consensus for inclusion. -- lTopGunl (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thr rsn board says the op ed in the article is ok to use Darkness Shines (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually, it will stay open because admins are supposed to close the RfC after 30 days. So, I have no power to decide.  Whenaxis  talk &middot; &#32;contribs  21:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

SPA's
Are IP;s from the ISI allowed to cast votes on this RFC? Darkness Shines (talk) 18:20, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you adding Not a ballot. I think that'll do for now. However, if all the IPs seem to pushing a POV, report it here.  Whenaxis  talk &middot; &#32;contribs &#124; DR goes to Wikimania!  22:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

List
Just a few uninvolved users have commented here, propose for this to be relisted (and maybe templated to NPOVN? I already added a link there, but doesn't seem to attract comments) to avoid issues with narrow consensus coming up again and more discussion on sources. -- lTopGunl (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * There's still a few more days until the 30 day mark (12 March 2012), so I think we should wait 'til then. If there isn't enough discussion, we can consider relisting it. Regards,  Whenaxis  talk &middot; &#32;contribs &#124; DR goes to Wikimania!  21:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Every one who commented was probably involved or came through noticeboard notifications or article talk page... why isn't this listed at Requests for comment/All, precisely at Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law for the bot to invite uninvovled? The template reads it has been listed to Politics, government, and law, but it never appears to have been actually listed. -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

It was listed just fine. There is no need to relist just because you may not like the result. This thing has been running for nearly 30 days and enough editors participated. JCAla (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Why is not listed there currently? I just checked out the list 1500 contributions of the RFC bot, it has not notified of it in any of those either. And you need to read WP:AOBF, there's no point in your accusation. I've raised a reasonable point. Anyway, informing Wikiproject India to gain attention from active Indian editors was a suboptimal effort. -- <b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b> (<b style="color:#000">talk</b>) 17:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * And FYI it was removed only a few days later. This is an unlisted discussion. -- <b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b> (<b style="color:#000">talk</b>) 17:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * recent rollback, am on my mobile and have large clumsy fingers Darkness Shines (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * It was listed under all three Wikiprojects: Afghanistan, India and Pakistan by AshLin and you. You should be aware of that. JCAla (talk) 19:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That was not an RFC list.. they were simple notifications to noticeboards. I listed it at Wikiproject Pakistan when AshLin told me that he had listed at the other two, to make it fair. RFC listings are done at the RFC board and in addition bot informs unrelated editors. That's called community input. This has been off the list... I've provided hard evidence. -- <b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b> (<b style="color:#000">talk</b>) 20:08, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Non closure notice
Adding one on top of the RFC will help new viewing editors who can comment till closure. -- <b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b> (<b style="color:#000">talk</b>) 01:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)