Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Justinm1978

Comments Prior to Making Editing Restrictions

 * Comment - Entire proposal lacks merit; in examining the contributions (removals of unsourced material; correcting errors of fact in articles, etc. etc.) it appears that the editor has edited in good faith. This proposal appears tendentious and lacking in merit. Badagnani (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Alan.ca
It wasn't uncivil, it was making a point. Alan.ca had been hammering the article (unfairly, to many) for months, not listening to others and their opinions. Therefore, his point is, in my eyes, moot.

Victor169.253.4.21 (talk)

Closing?
Since nobody but Miranda and Allstarecho finds any kind of real validity to this RFC, can we close it? Justinm1978 (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * It's generally archived in order - RFCs that have been filed before this that continue to attract activity would mean that this RFC still hangs around. I'll be archiving some soon though. But keep in mind, Rfcs that apparently haven't attracted enough responses are generally kept until consensus is clear. The WNDL42 case was opened in Feb and only archived earlier this month. Ncmvocalist (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC)