Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/KnowIG


 * Well, unsurprisingly, KnowIG's response is largely a collection of "well other people do it so I can," "it's all [insert random other editor]'s fault," protestations that this cannot be faulted grammatically or linguistically (!), the suggestion that the spelling of "prizon" here is nevertheless correct... the list goes on. Clearly, this is an editor with no intention of altering their behaviour for the better. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  constablewick  ─╢ 20:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I find it hightly hypercritical that you think that you can do whatever you like, e.g being abusive on a number of ocassions, when someone writes something to you, the first instinct is to delete in an abusive mannor and go running somewhere to get them in trouble. You have been blocked on numerous ocassions for disputing with others and were told to leave me alone, just as I was about you. Now I have not gone near you and all you do is stalk me and come up with new tatics to try and get rid of me. And lo and behold you write a snide comment on my talk page which you then use to come up with this load of rubbish.KnowIG (talk) 22:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * So you admit that I am not being out of order, but continue to nit pick at my spelling, grow up TT. Therefore nul and void isn't it cause that is not a reason to get someone banned.KnowIG (talk) 22:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Clearly TT has no intention of leaving me alone, nor will he stop being unrully in the language that he uses on wikipedia.KnowIG (talk) 22:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Getting desperate now, having to really nit pick at the grammer I see by choosing selective articlesKnowIG (talk) 22:46, 13 September 2010 (UTC)